The nurse is caring for four patients with chronic kidney disease. Which patient would the nurse assess first upon initial rounding?
a) Woman with a blood pressure of 158/90 mm Hg.
b) Patient with Kussmaul respirations.
c) Man with skin itching from head to toe.
d) Patient with halitosis and stomatitis.

The correct answer is: b) Patient with Kussmaul respirations.


Choice A reason: A blood pressure of 158/90 mm Hg in a patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is elevated and requires management to prevent complications. However, it is not as immediately life-threatening as Kussmaul respirations, which indicate severe metabolic acidosis.
Choice B reason: The patient with Kussmaul respirations should be assessed first. Kussmaul respirations are deep, labored breathing patterns typically associated with severe metabolic acidosis, such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DK

Choice A reason: Administering normal saline 500-1000 mL infused over 1 hour is an effective fluid challenge to promote kidney perfusion in patients with acute kidney injury and no signs of fluid overload. This intervention helps increase intravascular volume, improving renal blood flow and potentially enhancing urine output.

Choice B reason: Administering drugs to suppress aldosterone release is not appropriate for promoting kidney perfusion in this context. Suppressing aldosterone could potentially decrease sodium and water reabsorption, which may not be beneficial for improving renal perfusion in a patient with acute kidney injury.

Choice C reason: Having the patient drink several large glasses of water is not the most effective method for a fluid challenge. Oral intake may not provide the rapid volume expansion needed to improve kidney perfusion, especially in a patient with acute kidney injury where fluid balance and perfusion are critical.

Choice D reason: Instilling 500-1000 mL of normal saline through a nasogastric tube is not an appropriate fluid challenge for promoting kidney perfusion. This method is not typically used for volume expansion in the context of acute kidney injury, as it may not provide the rapid intravascular volume increase needed to enhance renal blood flow.

Choice A reason: Auscultating for irregular heart tones can provide useful information about the heart’s rhythm and potential arrhythmias. However, it is not the most specific or definitive assessment for diagnosing a myocardial infarction (MI).

Choice B reason: Assessing for ST elevations on continuous telemetry and 12-lead EKG is critical in diagnosing a myocardial infarction. ST-segment elevation is a key indicator of an acute MI, specifically indicating myocardial injury. Continuous telemetry and 12-lead EKG provide real-time and detailed views of the heart's electrical activity, helping to identify ischemic changes.

Choice C reason: Assessing for elevated Troponin levels is essential because Troponins are cardiac biomarkers that increase significantly when there is damage to the heart muscle, such as during an MI. Elevated Troponin levels are highly specific and sensitive indicators of myocardial infarction, making this assessment crucial.

Choice D reason: Assessing for low magnesium levels is not directly related to diagnosing a myocardial infarction. While magnesium levels are important for overall cardiac function, they do not specifically indicate an acute MI.

Choice E reason: Assessing the client's blood pressure is an important part of a comprehensive assessment and can provide information about the patient's hemodynamic status. However, it is not specific to diagnosing a myocardial infarction.

Choice F reason: Assessing if the pain radiates to the left arm is an important symptom of a myocardial infarction. However, while it supports the suspicion of an MI, it is not as definitive as ST elevation on an EKG or elevated Troponin levels.