The nurse observes the presence of brittle, concave curves to the nails of a client on assessment. Which information should the nurse obtain from the client that may explain the appearance of the nails?

Choice A Reason:
This option can help minimize clothing-related artifacts that may interfere with auscultation. Ensuring that the stethoscope is in direct contact with the skin allows for better transmission of sounds
Choice B Reason:
Ensuring the room is as quiet as possible is appropriate. Background noise can interfere with the clarity of auscultatory sounds. Ensuring a quiet environment helps reduce external interference and improves the nurse's ability to accurately hear and interpret the sounds.
Choice C Reason:
Keeping the examination room warm, and warm the stethoscope is appropriate. Cold temperatures can cause vasoconstriction and muscle tension, leading to increased tension in the skin and subcutaneous tissues, which may affect the quality of auscultatory sounds. Keeping the examination room warm and warming the stethoscope helps minimize this effect, ensuring clearer auscultation.
Choice D Reason:
Document the roaring and crackles is inappropriate. Documenting auscultatory findings such as roaring and crackles is important for clinical assessment and documentation but does not mitigate artifacts during auscultation. It is crucial to focus on optimizing the auscultation environment and technique to ensure accurate interpretation of sounds.
Choice E Reason:
Wetting the chest hair before auscultating is appropriate. Chest hair can create friction and produce artifacts during auscultation, particularly when using a stethoscope. Wetting the chest hair helps reduce friction and minimize artifacts, allowing for clearer auscultatory sounds.

Choice A Reason:
Audible thud without pain is incorrect. An audible thud without pain would not be an expected response when percussing the costovertebral angle (CVA) in a client with pyelonephritis. Pyelonephritis typically presents with tenderness upon percussion of the CVA due to inflammation or infection of the kidneys. The absence of pain in this scenario would not be consistent with the expected response.
Choice B Reason:
Rigidity and firmness are incorrect. Rigidity and firmness upon percussion of the costovertebral angle (CVA) may suggest muscle tension or guarding, rather than the tenderness typically associated with kidney inflammation or infection such as pyelonephritis. While guarding can occur in response to pain, it is not the expected response when assessing for kidney tenderness.
Choice C Reason:
Rebound tenderness is incorrect. Rebound tenderness refers to the exacerbation of pain upon release of pressure, typically observed in conditions such as peritonitis. While rebound tenderness may be present in some abdominal conditions, it is not the expected response when percussing the costovertebral angle (CVA) to assess for kidney tenderness in pyelonephritis. In pyelonephritis, tenderness upon initial percussion is more indicative of the condition.
Choice D Reason:
Sharp, severe pain is correct. Sharp, severe pain upon percussing the CVA suggests tenderness, which can be indicative of kidney inflammation or infection, such as pyelonephritis. This finding would support the diagnosis and help guide further assessment and treatment.