What is an unexpected finding of the cardiovascular system assessment?
Blood pressure 127/65, HR 68.
Trace edema to bilateral lower ankles.
Capillary refill within 2 seconds.
Apical and radial pulses equal.
The Correct Answer is B
Choice A reason: Blood pressure 127/65 and HR 68 are within normal ranges (BP <130/<80, HR 60-100), expected in healthy cardiovascular assessments. Trace edema is abnormal, suggesting fluid retention. Assuming this is unexpected risks overlooking normal findings, diverting focus from issues like edema needing evaluation in cardiovascular assessments.
Choice B reason: Trace edema in bilateral lower ankles is an unexpected finding, indicating potential fluid overload, heart failure, or venous insufficiency. Unlike normal vitals or pulses, edema requires investigation and reporting. Recognizing this ensures timely diagnosis and management, critical for preventing progression of underlying cardiovascular or systemic conditions in affected patients.
Choice C reason: Capillary refill within 2 seconds is normal, indicating adequate peripheral perfusion, expected in cardiovascular assessments. Edema is the abnormal finding. Assuming refill is unexpected risks misprioritizing normal findings, neglecting issues like edema that signal potential heart or venous issues, critical for accurate cardiovascular evaluation and care.
Choice D reason: Equal apical and radial pulses are expected, reflecting synchronized cardiac output, normal in cardiovascular assessments. Trace edema is abnormal, suggesting fluid issues. Assuming pulses are unexpected risks overlooking normal findings, diverting attention from edema, critical for identifying and managing underlying cardiovascular conditions in clinical practice.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: The trigeminal nerve (V) controls facial sensation and chewing, not smell, which is governed by the olfactory nerve (I). Misidentifying this risks incorrect neurological assessment, potentially missing olfactory deficits indicating brain injury or tumors, critical for accurate diagnosis and management in patients with sensory complaints.
Choice B reason: The optic nerve (II) governs vision, not smell, which is the olfactory nerve’s function (I). Assuming optic involvement misguides cranial nerve assessment, risking oversight of olfactory dysfunction, which may signal neurological conditions like Parkinson’s or trauma, requiring targeted evaluation and intervention in clinical practice.
Choice C reason: The olfactory nerve (I) is responsible for the sense of smell, transmitting sensory input from the nasal mucosa to the brain. Accurate identification ensures proper neurological assessment, detecting deficits that may indicate trauma, tumors, or neurodegenerative diseases, guiding diagnosis and treatment in patients with smell-related complaints.
Choice D reason: The vestibulocochlear nerve (VIII) controls hearing and balance, not smell, which is the olfactory nerve’s role (I). Misidentifying this risks incorrect assessment, potentially overlooking olfactory issues signaling neurological pathology, delaying diagnosis and management critical for addressing sensory deficits in clinical neurological evaluations.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Vital signs are objective, measurable data, not specific to musculoskeletal assessment or subjective experience. Pain, a subjective report, better fits the question. Assuming vital signs are subjective risks misclassifying data, leading to errors in prioritizing patient-reported symptoms like pain, critical for musculoskeletal care planning and intervention.
Choice B reason: Taking NSAIDs is a factual history, not a subjective assessment. Subjective data, like pain severity, reflect patient experience. Assuming medication use is subjective misaligns with assessment principles, risking neglect of patient-reported symptoms like pain, essential for evaluating musculoskeletal conditions and guiding effective pain management strategies.
Choice C reason: Pain rated 7 to 8 is subjective, based on the patient’s personal experience, central to musculoskeletal assessment for conditions like arthritis or injury. This guides pain management, like adjusting NSAIDs. Accurate identification ensures patient-centered care, addressing discomfort and improving function, critical for musculoskeletal health outcomes.
Choice D reason: Grimacing and holding a body part are objective, observable signs, not subjective reports. Pain severity, reported by the patient, is subjective. Assuming grimacing is subjective risks misclassification, potentially overlooking patient-reported pain levels, critical for tailoring interventions like analgesics in musculoskeletal assessment and care planning.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
