When providing care for a client hospitalized with acute pancreatitis who has acute abdominal pain, which nursing interventions would be most appropriate for this client? Select all that apply.

Choice A reason: Placing the client in a side-lying position is beneficial for comfort and can help alleviate pain in clients with acute pancreatitis. This position can reduce pressure on the pancreas and improve circulation, helping to manage pain and discomfort effectively.

Choice B reason: Administering hydromorphone for pain as prescribed is essential in managing acute abdominal pain associated with acute pancreatitis. Pain control is a priority in the care of these clients because unmanaged pain can lead to increased stress and further complications. Hydromorphone, a potent opioid analgesic, helps to effectively manage severe pain.

Choice C reason: Obtaining daily weights is important for monitoring a client's nutritional status and fluid balance, but it is not directly related to the immediate management of acute abdominal pain in acute pancreatitis. While it is a relevant intervention, it is not as critical as the other measures listed.

Choice D reason: Maintaining a high-calorie, high-protein diet is not appropriate for a client with acute pancreatitis. In fact, clients with acute pancreatitis are often placed on a nil-per-os (NPO) status initially to rest the pancreas and reduce enzyme secretion. Once the inflammation subsides, a low-fat, bland diet may be introduced gradually.

Choice E reason: Monitoring the client's respiratory status is crucial because clients with acute pancreatitis are at risk for respiratory complications, such as pleural effusion, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or atelectasis. Close monitoring ensures early detection and intervention for any respiratory issues that may arise.

Choice A reason: A urine output of 40 mL/hr is within the acceptable range, as normal urine output is typically around 30-50 mL/hr. While it should be monitored, it does not indicate an immediate life-threatening issue requiring urgent assessment.

Choice B reason: A blood pressure change from 128/74 to 110/88 mmHg may indicate potential hemodynamic instability. Although the systolic blood pressure has decreased, the diastolic pressure has increased, which can be concerning. This patient may be at risk for developing more significant blood pressure changes or other complications, making this situation the highest priority for assessment.

Choice C reason: An oxygen saturation level of 94% is generally considered acceptable. While it is on the lower end of the normal range, it does not indicate an immediate life-threatening condition. Continuous monitoring is important, but it is not the most urgent situation compared to the blood pressure change.

Choice D reason: A pulse change from 100 to 88 beats/min represents a decrease in heart rate but remains within the normal range for adult heart rate (60-100 beats/min). While this change should be noted and monitored, it is not as urgent as the blood pressure change that may indicate hemodynamic instability.