Which assessment of a patient in shock would give the nurse the most valuable information to determine there is adequate tissue perfusion?

Choice A reason:

Assessing the client's serum sodium level is the priority action. The symptoms of generalized edema, decreased urine output, acute confusion, and muscle weakness are suggestive of possible hyponatremia or other electrolyte imbalances, which can be critical in the postoperative period following a craniotomy. Checking the serum sodium level will provide essential information to guide further treatment.

Choice B reason:

While continuing to monitor the client's urinary output is important, it does not address the immediate need to diagnose and correct a potential electrolyte imbalance. The nurse needs to take action to determine the underlying cause of the patient's symptoms.

Choice C reason:

Increasing the rate of the IV infusion could potentially worsen the patient's condition, especially if the symptoms are related to fluid overload or electrolyte imbalance. This action should only be taken based on specific clinical indications and after appropriate assessments.

Choice D reason:

Administering desmopressin IV per protocol is not appropriate as the first action without confirming the underlying cause of the symptoms. Desmopressin is used for specific conditions such as diabetes insipidus, and its administration should be based on a confirmed diagnosis.

Choice A reason:

The extent of impairment following a spinal cord injury cannot be determined until any secondary injury to the cord has resolved. Secondary injury, such as inflammation and swelling, can worsen the initial damage and impact the long-term prognosis.

Choice B reason:

An MRI can reveal the extent of cord damage but does not provide a complete picture of the potential functional outcomes. The full extent of impairment cannot be determined solely by imaging.

Choice C reason:

Stating that the patient will have normal function when spinal shock resolves and the reflex arc returns is misleading and overly optimistic. Not all patients will regain normal function after a spinal cord injury, and outcomes vary.

Choice D reason:

While rehabilitation plays a crucial role in recovery, stating that it will be years before impairment can be determined is not entirely accurate. Functional outcomes can often be assessed sooner as the initial recovery phase progresses.