A nurse counseling an 85-year-old person regarding modifying driving habits would include

A. Stroke under the chin in a downward motion.
Explanation: Stroking under the chin in a downward motion is not considered a standard technique for managing dysphagia. It's important to focus on strategies that promote safe swallowing and prevent aspiration.

B. Keep pulse oximeter ready at all times.
Explanation: While monitoring oxygen saturation is important in certain situations, having a pulse oximeter ready at all times may not be a routine instruction for feeding a client with dysphagia. Monitoring for signs of distress and ensuring a safe feeding environment are key aspects of care.

C. Avoid rushing the client or force feeding her.
Explanation: Rushing or force-feeding a client with dysphagia can increase the risk of aspiration. It's important to allow the client to eat at their own pace and take adequate time to chew and swallow safely.

D. If facial weakness is present, place food on the impaired side of the mouth.
Explanation: Placing food on the impaired side of the mouth can help compensate for facial weakness and promote more effective chewing and swallowing.

E. Alternate solid and liquid boluses.
Explanation: Alternating solid and liquid boluses can help with the overall coordination of the swallowing process. It can also facilitate the movement of food and liquids through the digestive tract.

F. Have the client sit at 90 degrees during all of oral intake.
Explanation: Ensuring that the client sits at a 90-degree angle during oral intake helps promote an upright position that aids in swallowing and reduces the risk of aspiration.

A. Because a conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative, a court hearing is not required.

Explanation: This statement is not accurate. Conservatorships are legal arrangements that involve the appointment of a conservator to manage the financial affairs and assets of an individual who is unable to do so themselves. While conservatorships may be necessary for the protection of the individual, they are not automatically considered the least restrictive alternative, and a court hearing is typically required to establish one.

B. The most legally restricting way individuals and property can be handled are through conservatorships and guardianships.

Explanation: This statement is partially true. Conservatorships and guardianships are legal mechanisms that grant authority to individuals (conservators and guardians, respectively) to manage the affairs of someone who is unable to do so themselves. While they involve legal restrictions, whether they are the most restrictive or not can depend on the specific details of the arrangement and the jurisdiction.

C. A conservatorship entails control over property, whereas a guardianship entails control over the person.

Explanation: This statement is true. In general, a conservatorship focuses on managing the financial affairs and assets of an individual, while a guardianship involves decision-making authority over personal and healthcare matters. The roles and responsibilities of conservators and guardians may vary by jurisdiction, but the distinction between control over property and control over the person is a common principle.

D. Conservators cannot be members of the conservatee's (client's) family.

Explanation: This statement is not universally true. In many cases, family members can be appointed as conservators. The court will typically consider the best interests of the individual in need of protection when appointing a conservator, and a family member may be deemed suitable if they can fulfill the responsibilities of the role. The specific rules regarding who can be a conservator may vary by jurisdiction.