A nurse is assessing a client who is at 31 weeks of gestation. Which of the following findings should the nurse identify as an indication of a potential prenatal complication?

Choice A rationale:

Periodic tingling of fingers is a common symptom during pregnancy and is often related to hormonal changes and increased fluid retention. While it can be uncomfortable, it is not necessarily an indication of a potential prenatal complication.

Choice B rationale:

Absence of clonus is not an abnormal finding during pregnancy. Clonus is a series of involuntary muscle contractions and relaxations and is generally not expected during a routine assessment.

Choice C rationale:

Leg cramps are a common complaint during pregnancy and are usually caused by changes in calcium and magnesium levels. While they can be uncomfortable, they are not typically considered an indication of a potential prenatal complication.

Choice D rationale:

Blurred vision can be an indication of preeclampsia, a serious condition that can occur during pregnancy. Preeclampsia is characterized by high blood pressure and damage to organs, often affecting the eyes, kidneys, and liver. It is crucial for the nurse to recognize this symptom and promptly inform the healthcare provider for further evaluation and management.

Choice A rationale:

Gravida refers to the number of times a woman has been pregnant, and Para indicates the number of pregnancies that have reached viability (at least 20 weeks) Since the client has

been pregnant for the fourth time and delivered two full-term newborns (reached viability), she is gravida 4, and since she had one spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) at 10 weeks of gestation, she is para 2 (two pregnancies reached viability)

Choice B rationale:

This choice would be incorrect because it indicates that the client has had three pregnancies reaching viability, but she has only had two full-term newborns and one miscarriage.

Choice C rationale:

This is the correct choice, as explained above. Choice D rationale:

This choice would be incorrect because it indicates that the client has had four pregnancies reaching viability, but she has only had two full-term newborns and one miscarriage.