A nurse is assisting in the care of a client who is in the second stage of labor. Which of the following findings should the nurse report to the provider?

Choice A rationale:

The nurse should recommend the client to increase cellulose and fluid in the diet. Cellulose is a type of fiber found in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Increasing fiber intake can help alleviate constipation by adding bulk to the stool and promoting regular bowel movements. Additionally, the recommendation to increase fluid intake complements the effect of fiber, as it softens the stool, making it easier to pass through the intestines. This combination of increased cellulose and fluid intake is a safe and natural way to address constipation during pregnancy without the need for medication or invasive interventions.

Choice B rationale:

Regular use of glycerine suppositories is not the best recommendation for pregnant clients experiencing constipation. Suppositories are inserted into the rectum to stimulate bowel movements and should only be used sparingly when other methods have failed. Pregnant individuals may have increased sensitivity, and it's essential to avoid unnecessary procedures or potential discomfort.

Choice C rationale:

Regular use of a laxative is also not the most suitable recommendation for a pregnant client with constipation. While laxatives can provide relief, they may lead to dependency and might have adverse effects on the developing fetus. It is best to explore safer and more natural methods before resorting to laxative use during pregnancy.

Choice D rationale:

Maintenance of good posture is essential during pregnancy for various rationales, but it is not a specific solution for constipation. While maintaining good posture can help alleviate back pain and other discomforts, it does not directly address the issue of constipation.

Choice A rationale:

Increasing the rate of the maintenance IV infusion may be a rational action in some situations, but it is not the first priority when dealing with a fetal heart rate deceleration. The priority is to address the deceleration and potential fetal distress promptly.

Choice B rationale:

Administering oxygen using a nonrebreather mask might be beneficial for the client, but it is not the primary action to take when dealing with fetal heart rate deceleration. The priority is to address the deceleration and ensure fetal well-being.

Choice C rationale:

Elevating the client's legs is unlikely to have a significant impact on fetal heart rate deceleration. This action is more relevant in cases of maternal hypotension or when trying to improve venous return to the heart. It is not the first-line intervention for fetal heart rate decelerations.

Choice D rationale:

Placing the client in the lateral (side-lying) position is the correct action to take first. This position can help relieve pressure on the vena cava, improve blood flow, and increase oxygen supply to the fetus. By changing the client's position, the nurse can potentially resolve the fetal heart rate deceleration and improve fetal well-being.