A nurse is assisting with implementing new actions designed to reduce medication errors on her unit. Which of the following should the nurse use to measure the effectiveness of these actions?
The number of medication errors avoided after the actions were implemented
A comparison of the number of medication errors before and after the actions were implemented
Results of a study about the time and money required to implement the changes
Results of a staff questionnaire that quantifies staff satisfaction with the changes
The Correct Answer is B
Explanation:
A. The number of medication errors avoided after the actions were implemented:
This measure assesses the direct impact of the new actions on reducing medication errors. By tracking the number of errors that were avoided after implementing the interventions, the nurse can gauge the effectiveness of the changes in improving medication safety.
B. A comparison of the number of medication errors before and after the actions were implemented:
This measure involves comparing the baseline number of medication errors before implementing the new actions with the number of errors after implementation. It provides a clear comparison to determine if the interventions have led to a reduction in medication errors over time.
C. Results of a study about the time and money required to implement the changes:
While studying the time and financial resources needed to implement changes is important for evaluating feasibility and resource allocation, it does not directly measure the effectiveness of the actions in reducing medication errors.
D. Results of a staff questionnaire that quantifies staff satisfaction with the changes:
Staff satisfaction is an important aspect of change implementation, but it does not serve as a direct measure of the effectiveness of the actions in reducing medication errors. It reflects staff perceptions rather than objective outcomes related to medication safety.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Explanation:
A. The child was brought to the facility 30 minutes after the injury occurred:
The timing of seeking medical attention alone may not necessarily indicate abuse. However, if there are inconsistencies in the reported mechanism of injury or if there is a delay in seeking medical care without a valid explanation, it can raise suspicion and warrant further investigation.
B. The parents report that the child injured herself by falling off the couch:
While falls are common causes of fractures in toddlers, spiral fractures are more commonly associated with twisting or torsional forces, which can raise concerns about non-accidental trauma. If the reported mechanism of injury does not align with the type of fracture or if there are inconsistencies in the history provided, it may indicate potential abuse.
C. The child begins to cry when her arm is examined by the provider:
It is common for children to cry or show discomfort during a physical examination, especially if they are in pain or feeling anxious. While this finding alone may not indicate abuse, it is essential to assess the child's behavior, pain response, and overall presentation for any additional signs or patterns of abuse.
D. The child's examination shows a single injury:
The presence of a single injury does not necessarily rule out abuse. Abusive injuries can be single or multiple, and the absence of other injuries does not negate the possibility of abuse. It is crucial to consider the context, history, and clinical findings comprehensively when evaluating for abuse.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Explanation:
A. Open access peer-reviewed articles must be purchased by the user.
This statement is not accurate. Open access peer-reviewed articles are freely available to users without the need for purchase. They are published under an open access model, making them accessible to anyone with an internet connection.
B. Peer-reviewed articles are not considered scholarly sources of evidence.
This statement is incorrect. Peer-reviewed articles are indeed considered scholarly sources of evidence. They undergo a rigorous peer-review process where experts in the field review the content for accuracy, validity, and reliability before publication.
C. Editorial opinion articles by journalists can be as relevant as peer-reviewed articles.
This statement is generally not accurate in the context of evidence-based practice. While editorial opinion articles may offer valuable insights and perspectives, they are not subjected to the same level of scrutiny and review as peer-reviewed articles. Peer-reviewed articles are typically considered more reliable and credible sources of evidence in healthcare and academic settings.
D. Peer-reviewed articles have been through laborious review by other professionals.
This statement is correct. Peer-reviewed articles undergo a thorough review process by other professionals in the same field before they are accepted for publication. This review process ensures that the research and information presented in the article meet high standards of quality, accuracy, and validity.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
