A nurse is caring for a client who has sustained a gasoline burn to 25% of the body. Which of the following is a priority safety concern when caring for this client?

A. Change the dressing when it is saturated:

This intervention is the most appropriate for managing a deep wound with a wet to-damp dressing. Wet to-damp dressings are designed to maintain a moist environment conducive to wound healing. Changing the dressing when it becomes saturated with wound exudate helps prevent excessive moisture accumulation, which can lead to skin maceration and potential infection. It ensures that the wound bed remains in an optimal healing environment and reduces the risk of complications.

B. Assess the wound bed once a day:

Assessing the wound bed is an essential part of wound care, as it allows the nurse to monitor healing progress, assess for signs of infection, and evaluate the effectiveness of the chosen dressing. However, the frequency of wound bed assessment may vary depending on the specific patient's needs and the type of dressing being used. While daily assessment is generally recommended, it does not directly dictate the timing of dressing changes for wet to-damp dressings, which are primarily changed based on saturation levels.

C. Contact the provider when the dressing leaks:

Contacting the provider when the dressing leaks or when there are concerns or complications is an important step in patient care. Leaking dressings can indicate issues with the dressing application, excessive wound exudate, or potential complications such as infection. It's crucial to inform the provider promptly so that appropriate interventions can be implemented, but this instruction is more reactive and does not specifically address the timing of dressing changes.

D. Change the dressing every 6 hours:

Changing the dressing every 6 hours is not typically recommended for wet to-damp dressings unless specifically indicated based on the patient's condition and the amount of wound exudate. Frequent dressing changes can disrupt the healing process, cause unnecessary trauma to the wound bed, and increase the risk of infection. Dressing change frequency should be based on the assessment of wound exudate and the dressing's ability to maintain a moist environment.

A. Blood pressure:

Monitoring blood pressure is a crucial aspect of evaluating fluid resuscitation in burn patients. Adequate fluid resuscitation should help maintain stable blood pressure levels within an acceptable range. Hypotension (low blood pressure) can indicate inadequate fluid resuscitation, leading to poor tissue perfusion and organ function. On the other hand, hypertension (high blood pressure) may suggest fluid overload, which can lead to complications such as pulmonary edema. Therefore, regular monitoring of blood pressure helps assess the effectiveness of fluid resuscitation and guides adjustments in fluid administration rates.

B. Bowel sounds:

While bowel sounds are important indicators of gastrointestinal motility and function, they are not directly used to evaluate the success of fluid resuscitation in burn patients. Bowel sounds may be assessed for other reasons, such as postoperative recovery or gastrointestinal conditions, but they do not provide specific information about fluid resuscitation status or tissue perfusion.

C. Level of consciousness:

Assessing the client's level of consciousness is crucial during fluid resuscitation for burns. Changes in consciousness, such as confusion, lethargy, or altered mental status, can indicate inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation. A clear and responsive level of consciousness suggests adequate fluid resuscitation and perfusion to vital organs, while alterations in consciousness may prompt further evaluation and adjustment of fluid resuscitation strategies.

D. Urine output:

Monitoring urine output is a key parameter in evaluating fluid resuscitation in burn patients. Adequate urine output (0.5 to 1 mL/kg/hr in adults) indicates sufficient renal perfusion and function, suggesting effective fluid resuscitation. Decreased urine output or oliguria may indicate inadequate fluid resuscitation, renal impairment, or hypovolemia, requiring reassessment and potential adjustments in fluid administration rates or type of fluids used.

E. Platelet count:

Platelet count is an important component of the complete blood count (CBC) and is used to assess clotting function and risk of bleeding. However, platelet count is not specifically used to evaluate the success of fluid resuscitation in burn patients. While clotting parameters may be monitored in burn patients, including platelet count, they are not direct indicators of fluid resuscitation status or tissue perfusion. Other laboratory parameters, such as hemoglobin, hematocrit, electrolyte levels, and arterial blood gases, may be monitored to assess the effectiveness of fluid resuscitation.