A nurse is caring for an older client who has had a hemorrhagic stroke. The client has exhibited impulsive behavior and, despite reminders from the nurse, doesn’t recognize their limitations. Which priority measure should the nurse implement to prevent injury?
Encourage the client to do as much as possible without assistance, and to use the call light only in emergencies
Ask a health care provider to order a vest and wrist restraints
Encourage the family to reprimand the client if they don’t ask for help with transfers and mobility
Install a bed alarm to remind the client to ask for assistance and to alert staff that the client is getting out of bed
The Correct Answer is D
Reasoning:
Choice A reason: Encouraging independence without assistance in an impulsive client post-hemorrhagic stroke increases fall risk. Their lack of insight into limitations heightens injury potential. A bed alarm is safer, as it alerts staff to assist, preventing falls due to unrecognized motor or cognitive deficits.
Choice B reason: Ordering restraints like vests or wrist restraints is not the first choice, as they restrict autonomy and may increase agitation in an impulsive client. Non-invasive measures like bed alarms are preferred to prevent injury while preserving dignity and promoting safe mobility post-stroke.
Choice C reason: Encouraging family to reprimand the client for not seeking help may increase emotional distress and does not prevent injury. It fails to address impulsive behavior directly. A bed alarm proactively alerts staff to assist, reducing fall risk more effectively than behavioral reprimands.
Choice D reason: Installing a bed alarm is the priority to prevent injury in an impulsive client post-hemorrhagic stroke. It alerts staff when the client attempts to move unassisted, compensating for their lack of insight into limitations, reducing fall risk, and ensuring timely assistance for safe mobility.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Reasoning:
Choice A reason: Extensive burns can trigger DIC through tissue damage and inflammation, releasing procoagulants that activate clotting. However, the risk is lower than in septic shock, as burns primarily cause localized injury, and systemic coagulopathy is less intense unless complicated by secondary infection or severe hypoperfusion.
Choice B reason: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may contribute to DIC through inflammation and hypoxia, but it is not the primary driver. ARDS affects lung function, and coagulopathy is secondary to underlying causes like sepsis, which has a more direct and potent effect on widespread clotting activation.
Choice C reason: Multiple trauma increases DIC risk through tissue injury and blood loss, activating coagulation pathways. However, septic shock has a higher risk due to systemic infection driving intense inflammatory and coagulative responses, consuming platelets and clotting factors more aggressively, leading to a greater likelihood of DIC.
Choice D reason: Septic shock poses the highest DIC risk, as systemic infection triggers massive cytokine release and endothelial damage, activating the coagulation cascade. This leads to widespread microthrombi, consuming platelets and clotting factors, causing both thrombosis and bleeding, making septic shock the most likely precipitant in ICU clients.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Reasoning:
Choice A reason: Homonymous hemianopsia causes loss of half the visual field, affecting object recognition due to visual impairment, not cognitive processing. The client’s need to inspect clothing to identify it suggests a sensory processing deficit, not a visual field loss, making agnosia more likely.
Choice B reason: Receptive aphasia impairs language comprehension, affecting the ability to understand spoken or written words, not object recognition. The client’s ability to identify clothing by inspection, not language, points to a sensory processing issue, ruling out aphasia as the primary impairment.
Choice C reason: Hemiplegia, or paralysis of one side, affects movement, not object recognition. The client’s difficulty identifying clothing is cognitive, not motor, as they can manipulate items but need visual inspection to understand them, indicating agnosia rather than a physical impairment like hemiplegia.
Choice D reason: Agnosia, a post-stroke impairment, prevents recognition of objects despite intact sensory input. The client’s need to inspect clothing to identify it suggests visual agnosia, where the brain fails to process familiar objects, matching the described behavior and indicating a perceptual deficit from stroke.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
