A nurse is completing an incident report after a client fall. Which of the following competencies of Quality and Safety Education for Nurses is the nurse demonstrating?

Choice A reason: Discussing preferences for repositioning schedules is secondary to assessing physical ability in stroke clients, who may have hemiplegia. Evaluating ability ensures safety. Assuming preferences are priority risks unsafe repositioning, potentially causing falls, critical to avoid in ensuring safe mobility and care for stroke patients.

Choice B reason: Evaluating the client’s ability to assist with repositioning is critical post-stroke to assess motor function, ensuring safe technique and preventing injury. This informs whether assistive devices or additional staff are needed, essential for reducing fall risk, promoting recovery, and tailoring care to the client’s physical capacity.

Choice C reason: Repositioning without assistive devices is unsafe for stroke clients with potential weakness or paralysis, risking falls or strain. Evaluating ability is priority. Assuming no devices are needed risks injury, critical to prevent in ensuring safe handling, supporting recovery, and maintaining safety in stroke rehabilitation care.

Choice D reason: Raising side rails ensures safety but is secondary to evaluating the client’s ability to assist, which guides repositioning technique. Assuming rails are the first step risks overlooking physical capacity, potentially leading to unsafe repositioning, critical to avoid in preventing falls and ensuring safe care for stroke clients.

Choice A reason: Confirming the client’s perception of the crisis is the first step, establishing trust and understanding their emotional state, critical for effective intervention. This guides tailored support, essential for addressing depression in a situational crisis, ensuring therapeutic communication, and promoting coping in mental health care settings.

Choice B reason: Teaching relaxation techniques is useful but secondary to understanding the client’s crisis perception, which informs interventions. Assuming techniques are first risks misaligned support, potentially escalating distress, critical to avoid in ensuring effective crisis management for clients with depression experiencing situational stressors.

Choice C reason: Identifying strengths supports coping but follows confirming the client’s crisis perception, which sets the therapeutic foundation. Prioritizing strengths risks overlooking the client’s immediate emotional needs, potentially delaying effective intervention, critical to prevent in managing depression during a situational crisis in mental health care.

Choice D reason: Notifying a support person is secondary to understanding the client’s crisis perception, which guides initial intervention. Assuming notification is first risks bypassing the client’s perspective, potentially reducing trust, critical to avoid in ensuring client-centered care for depression in situational crisis management.