A patient is taking a combination of antiviral drugs as treatment for early stages of a viral infection. While discussing the drug therapy, the patient asks the nurse if the drugs will kill the virus. When answering, the nurse keeps in mind which fact about antiviral drugs?
They are given for palliative reasons only.
They may also kill healthy cells while killing viruses.
They will be effective as long as the patient is not exposed to the virus again.
They can be given in large enough doses to eradicate the virus without harming the body’s healthy cells.
The correct answer is: b) They may also kill healthy cells while killing viruses.
The Correct Answer is B
Choice A reason: Antiviral drugs are not solely for palliative care. They inhibit viral replication, reducing viral load and disease severity, as with acyclovir for herpes. While some provide symptomatic relief, many target specific viral processes, aiming for virologic suppression or cure, not just palliation.
Choice B reason: Antiviral drugs, like acyclovir, inhibit viral replication (e.g., DNA polymerase), but some, like chemotherapy agents, can affect healthy cells with high turnover, causing side effects like myelosuppression. This non-specificity is a key consideration, as it limits dosing and requires monitoring for toxicity.
Choice C reason: Antiviral efficacy does not depend on avoiding re-exposure. Drugs like oseltamivir reduce viral replication during active infection, but re-exposure may cause new infections. Prophylaxis or vaccination prevents reinfection, not the drug’s initial effectiveness, making this statement incorrect for antiviral therapy.
Choice D reason: Antivirals cannot be dosed to eradicate viruses without harming healthy cells. Their mechanisms, like inhibiting viral enzymes, often affect host cells, causing toxicity (e.g., nephrotoxicity with acyclovir). Dose limitations balance efficacy and safety, preventing complete viral eradication without side effects.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Drowsiness is not a systemic effect of inhaled albuterol, a beta-2 agonist. Albuterol stimulates beta-adrenergic receptors, increasing cyclic AMP, which can cause CNS stimulation, not sedation. Drowsiness is more associated with antihistamines or other CNS-depressant drugs, not bronchodilators like albuterol.
Choice B reason: Bradycardia is unlikely with albuterol, which activates beta-2 receptors and, to a lesser extent, beta-1 receptors in the heart, potentially causing tachycardia. Systemic absorption of inhaled albuterol can increase heart rate, not decrease it, as it stimulates sympathetic activity, making this incorrect.
Choice C reason: Heartburn is not a recognized systemic effect of inhaled albuterol. While gastrointestinal irritation may occur with oral beta-agonists, inhaled albuterol has minimal systemic absorption, targeting airway smooth muscle. Its side effects are primarily cardiovascular or neurological, not gastrointestinal, making this an incorrect choice.
Choice D reason: Palpitations are a possible systemic effect of inhaled albuterol due to its beta-adrenergic stimulation. Even with low systemic absorption, albuterol can stimulate cardiac beta-1 receptors, increasing heart rate and causing palpitations. This is a known side effect, particularly in sensitive patients or with overuse.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Monitoring alone is insufficient with elevated ALT and AST, indicating liver dysfunction. Metronidazole is metabolized by the liver, and hepatotoxicity is a known risk. Administering it to a patient with pre-existing liver damage could worsen hepatic injury, making this action inadequate.
Choice B reason: Elevated ALT and AST suggest liver dysfunction, and metronidazole, metabolized hepatically, can exacerbate hepatotoxicity. Avoiding administration prevents further liver damage, as the drug’s nitroimidazole structure undergoes hepatic reduction, producing toxic metabolites that stress an already compromised liver, necessitating alternative therapy.
Choice C reason: Reducing the metronidazole dose is not recommended without medical consultation. Elevated liver enzymes indicate impaired hepatic function, and even reduced doses may worsen hepatotoxicity. Alternative antibiotics with less hepatic metabolism should be considered, making dose reduction an unsafe choice.
Choice D reason: Administering metronidazole as prescribed is dangerous with elevated ALT and AST, signaling liver dysfunction. Metronidazole’s hepatic metabolism can exacerbate liver injury, increasing the risk of severe hepatotoxicity. The nurse should withhold the drug and consult the prescriber for safer alternatives.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
