A phlebotomist should recognize that the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends that a heel stick depth should not penetrate deeper than which of the following depths for an infant patient?
2.0 mm
2.5 mm
3.0 mm
3.5 mm
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A Reason:
The recommended heel stick depth of 2.0 mm is based on the need to minimize the risk of injury to the infant. Penetrating deeper than this can increase the likelihood of hitting bone, which in infants can be as close as 2.0 mm under the skin of the plantar surface of the heel. This depth is sufficient to obtain a blood sample without risking injury to deeper tissues or bone.
Choice B Reason:
A depth of 2.5 mm may be too deep for some infants, especially preterm or very small infants, where the calcaneus (heel bone) is closer to the surface. While this depth might still be safe for some infants, it does not provide the same margin of safety as the 2.0 mm recommendation and could potentially lead to bone puncture or other injuries.
Choice C Reason:
A depth of 3.0 mm significantly increases the risk of bone puncture, especially in infants with less subcutaneous fat or in those who are preterm. This depth could easily breach the protective layer of skin and subcutaneous tissue, leading to a higher risk of osteomyelitis, an infection of the bone, which can be a serious complication in infants.
Choice D Reason:
A depth of 3.5 mm is considered too deep for a heel stick procedure and is likely to cause injury to the infant. This depth would almost certainly penetrate the bone in most infants, leading to severe pain, potential for infection, and other complications. It is well beyond the safe range recommended by CLSI and should be avoided.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Asking "When was your last dose of lithium?" is crucial for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM is used to tailor dosages and maintain therapeutic levels in a patient’s bloodstream, especially for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices like lithium. The timing of the last dose can significantly affect blood levels, and knowing this information helps in interpreting the results accurately.
Choice B Reason:
While knowing the fasting status of a patient may be relevant for certain tests, it is not typically critical for TDM unless the medication being monitored is affected by food intake. Lithium levels are not significantly influenced by fasting, so this question is less relevant than knowing the timing of the last dose.
Choice C Reason:
Inquiring about the last alcoholic beverage is important if alcohol could interfere with the medication's metabolism or the test's accuracy. However, for lithium TDM, alcohol consumption is not as directly relevant as the timing of the last dose. Alcohol does not typically alter lithium levels unless it affects the patient's hydration status.
Choice D Reason:
Asking if the patient has finished drinking the glucose solution would be pertinent if conducting a glucose tolerance test. However, this is not relevant for TDM of lithium, as the glucose solution does not interfere with lithium levels or the TDM process.
In conclusion, for therapeutic drug monitoring, particularly for lithium, the most critical question is regarding the timing of the last dose. This information is essential to ensure that the blood levels reflect the peak or trough concentration, depending on what is being measured, and to avoid misinterpretation that could lead to inappropriate dosing adjustments.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Inverting the tube 5 to 7 times may not be sufficient to mix the blood thoroughly with the EDTA. This could lead to partial clotting and potentially inaccurate test results. The EDTA anticoagulant works by binding calcium ions, which are necessary for blood clotting. Without adequate mixing, the EDTA may not be evenly distributed, leaving some areas of the blood sample able to clot.
Choice B Reason:
Inverting the tube only 2 to 4 times is inadequate for proper mixing. This minimal agitation would likely result in clot formation because the anticoagulant would not be sufficiently mixed with the blood. Clots can interfere with the accuracy of hematological tests by trapping cells and altering the specimen's composition.
Choice C Reason:
Inverting the tube 1 to 3 times is clearly insufficient and would almost certainly lead to clotting. The purpose of inverting the tube is to ensure that the EDTA coats all the blood cells, preventing coagulation. Such a low number of inversions would not allow for the anticoagulant to perform its function effectively.
Choice D Reason:
Inverting the tube 8 to 10 times is the recommended practice. This number of inversions ensures that the blood is fully mixed with the EDTA, preventing clot formation and preserving the integrity of the sample for accurate laboratory analysis. It is important to perform these inversions gently to avoid hemolysis, which can also affect test results. Hemolysis occurs when red blood cells are damaged and their contents leak out, which can happen if the blood is shaken too vigorously.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.