A researcher writes a grant proposal to repeat an experiment that was recently published by another researcher. Which of the following statements best supports the grant proposal?
Repeating the published work will provide independent confirmation of the results.
Repeating published work with changed variables will extend the previous results.
Funding this important research will benefit science in the long term.
Funding this grant proposal will allow this laboratory to continue to study this topic.
The Correct Answer is A
The statement that best supports the grant proposal is a. Repeating the published work will provide independent confirmation of the results. Independent confirmation of results is an important part of the scientific process. By repeating an experiment that was recently published by another researcher, the researcher writing the grant proposal can provide additional evidence to support or refute the original findings.
B. Repeating published work with changed variables will extend the previous results, but this is not the main goal of repeating an experiment.
C. Funding this important research will benefit science in the long term is a general statement that does not specifically support the grant proposal to repeat an experiment.
D. Funding this grant proposal will allow this laboratory to continue to study this topic is also a general statement that does not specifically support the grant proposal to repeat an experiment.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
The result of using a catalyst in a chemical reaction is that the reaction is completed in a shorter amount of time. A catalyst is a chemical substance that affects the rate of a chemical reaction by altering the activation energy required for the reaction to proceed. This process is called catalysis. A catalyst provides an alternative pathway for the reaction, one that has a lower activation energy than the uncatalyzed pathway.
The other options are not correct because they do not accurately describe the result of using a catalyst in a chemical reaction. A more desirable product is not necessarily formed, a greater amount of heat energy is not necessarily released by the reaction, and the yield of the product is not necessarily increased as a result of using a catalyst.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
The statement "Experiments cannot validate hypotheses, only falsify them" can be restated as "A hypothesis that has not been falsified remains provisional." This means that a hypothesis is considered valid until it is disproved by experimental evidence. However, even if a hypothesis has not been falsified, it is still considered provisional and subject to further testing and scrutiny.
A. "Until disproved, an explanation for an observation is valid" is similar to the correct answer but does not capture the provisional nature of a hypothesis.
B. "Certain concepts cannot be subjected to direct experimentation" is not a restatement of the original statement.
D. "Proving a hypothesis exempts it from further testing" is incorrect because no hypothesis can be definitively proven and all hypotheses are subject to further testing and scrutiny.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today