On a school playground, the teacher states, "Look at those children running one right after the other. They are so close together that if one of them stops, the next one will run into the other. So, if one stops, they all will fall down." Assuming the above statements are true, the main claim of the passage:
must also be true.
is probably false, but could be true.
could not be true.
is probably true, but may be false.
The Correct Answer is D
A. This answer is too absolute. While the teacher’s reasoning suggests a likely outcome (if one child stops, the others might collide), it does not guarantee that all children will fall down, as there could be variations in the children's reactions or the space between them. Therefore, the claim doesn’t must be true.
B. This option suggests that the claim is likely false, which isn’t accurate. The scenario presented by the teacher seems plausible, so it’s more likely true, though it’s not guaranteed.
C. The statement could be true, as the reasoning is based on the children’s positions and actions. There is no reason to completely rule it out, so this answer is incorrect.
D. This is the most reasonable conclusion. The teacher’s statement is based on an assumption that if one child stops, the others will not be able to avoid collision. This is a reasonable assumption in this context, but it’s not certain—there might be enough space or a difference in the children's reactions that prevents them from all falling. Thus, it’s likely true, but not guaranteed.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A. The man complains frequently and counseling is recommended: This option implies that the man’s symptoms may be psychological, but it does not provide the best explanation for the situation. Even though his test results are normal, there could still be an underlying physical issue or condition that has not yet been identified. Counseling might be helpful, but it's not the best explanation based on the information given.
B. Even though the tests are normal, continual monitoring is needed: This is the most appropriate answer. Normal test results mean no immediate, obvious cause has been found for the symptoms. However, symptoms like headaches and visual disturbances could be early indicators of a condition that has not yet been detected, so continued monitoring might be necessary to track any changes over time.
C. The signs and symptoms reported by the man are not real: This option is dismissive and not a reasonable conclusion. Just because the tests are normal doesn’t mean the symptoms aren’t real. The man’s experience of headaches and visual disturbances is valid, even if a physical cause hasn't been found yet.
D. The man has many physical problems that cannot be explained: While this might be a possibility, it’s a broader and less specific explanation. The fact that tests are normal means there isn’t currently evidence of a serious physical issue that is identifiable. It's more reasonable to focus on monitoring and further investigation if needed.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
A. The spokesperson dismisses the speed limit based on the argument that millions of people drive faster and don't experience car breakdowns. However, they ignore the other key argument that the speed limit saves lives, which is a significant factor in the debate about speed limits. The reasoning is incomplete because it fails to address the full scope of the original claim regarding safety.
B. This option is not relevant to the reasoning presented in the statement. The issue is not about the importance of the car manufacturer's beliefs but about the limited reasoning used to dismiss the speed limit.
C. The speaker's argument does not demonstrate a clear relationship between speed and car breakdown; it only suggests that some people drive faster without apparent car breakdowns, which doesn't prove a direct cause-and-effect relationship.
D. The speaker's reasoning does not conclusively show that auto safety cannot be improved; it merely challenges one aspect of the argument (car breakdowns). The reasoning is incomplete and ignores the life-saving aspect of the speed limit.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.