Suppose a study of heroin users shows 70% had used marijuana before they tried heroin. The conclusion of the study states all marijuana users will eventually try heroin. This conclusion:
is factual information.
is a hasty generalization.
is an unclear assumption.
needs no further support
The Correct Answer is B
A. The conclusion is not a statement of fact, but rather a generalization based on a study of a specific group of people. The fact that 70% of heroin users had used marijuana before does not automatically lead to the conclusion that all marijuana users will try heroin.
B. The conclusion makes an unwarranted leap by suggesting that because 70% of heroin users had used marijuana, all marijuana users will eventually try heroin. The sample studied doesn't represent all marijuana users, and making this broad statement about all marijuana users is an overgeneralization.
C. While the conclusion may be an assumption, it's more specific in that it makes a sweeping, unjustified generalization. The issue is not clarity, but the improper inference drawn from the data.
D. The conclusion actually needs much more support and is not logically valid as it stands. It makes a broad statement that is not directly supported by the data.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A. the horses in the study were racehorses and the findings do not apply to horses in general: The study specifically involved racehorses, so this statement is true, but it doesn’t directly address the core finding of the study, which is the relationship between iron-rich diet and increased track speed.
B. iron rich feed is associated with an increased track speed in racehorses: The study shows that 75% of the horses showed improved track speed after receiving an iron-rich diet, indicating an association between the two variables.
C. regulations regarding the type of dietary intake for racehorses should be enforced: The study doesn’t suggest that regulations are necessary; it only shows an association. The study does not provide enough information to make regulatory recommendations.
D. regular, non-iron enriched feed causes decreased track speed in racehorses: The study does not discuss non-iron-enriched feed or make any claims about its effect on racehorse speed. The study only examined the effects of an iron-rich diet, not the comparison with other types of feed.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A. accept the date enthusiastically: While it's great to stay open-minded, accepting the date without knowing anything about the person could lead to another disappointing experience if the connection doesn't feel right.
B. arrange to talk to the date by phone: This is the most reasonable option. By talking on the phone, you can get a better sense of the person's character, interests, and communication style. It also helps reduce the pressure of a blind date by allowing you to make a more informed decision.
C. make the decision based solely on your past experiences: Relying only on your past experiences could limit your chances of finding a good match. Just because your previous blind dates were difficult doesn’t mean the next one will be, especially since the new date is arranged by a family member.
D. turn the date down: Turning it down without considering the opportunity might be premature. If you don't take the chance to communicate first, you may be closing the door on a potentially good match.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.