The mother of a child with cerebral palsy (CP) asks the nurse if her child's impaired movements will worsen as the child grows.

Which response provides the best explanation?

Choice A rationale:

Increasing the supplemental oxygen to 15 L/min via nasal cannula may seem like a logical step given the client’s low oxygen saturation. However, it’s important to note that oxygen therapy should be titrated carefully. Too much oxygen can lead to oxygen toxicity, which can cause cellular damage and worsen the client’s condition. Therefore, this is not the priority action.

Choice B rationale:

Notifying the health care provider of the client’s condition is the priority action. The client’s oxygen saturation is 88% on room air, which is below the normal range of 95% to 100%. This indicates that the client is not getting enough oxygen, which can lead to hypoxia and other serious complications. The health care provider needs to be informed immediately so that appropriate interventions can be initiated.

Choice C rationale:

Administering ibuprofen as ordered for fever is important, but it’s not the priority in this situation. While fever can indicate an infection, which could be contributing to the client’s low oxygen saturation, addressing the immediate issue of hypoxia is more critical.

Choice D rationale:

Obtaining a sputum culture from the client could provide valuable information about the type of bacteria causing the pneumonia and guide antibiotic therapy. However, this is not an immediate priority compared to addressing the client’s low oxygen saturation. In summary, while all these actions are important in caring for a client with pneumonia, the nurse must prioritize interventions based on their urgency and potential impact on the client’s health status. In this case, notifying the health care provider of the client’s condition is the most critical action.

Choice A rationale:

Including the family in the discharge teaching is essential, especially when dealing with a client who has communication barriers such as hearing loss and illiteracy. Involving the daughter in the teaching process ensures that she is aware of the client's care needs and can provide support at home.

Choice B rationale:

Encouraging the client to attend reading classes is not a practical intervention for an older adult with hearing loss. Reading classes may not address the immediate communication needs of the client, and the client's primary caregiver, in this case, is the daughter who will provide daily care and support.

Choice C rationale:

Facing the client when speaking is a crucial intervention when dealing with someone who has hearing loss. By facing the client, the nurse ensures that the client can see their lips and facial expressions, which can aid in lip-reading and understanding the communication better.

Choice D rationale:

Speaking loudly when teaching is not always the best approach for clients with hearing loss. While it may seem intuitive to speak loudly, it can distort speech and make it more challenging for the client to understand. Clear and slow speech, along with visual cues, is often more effective.

Choice E rationale:

Providing the daughter with written instructions is essential, especially when the client has limited reading skills. Written instructions can serve as a reference guide for the daughter, helping her provide care and support to her father accurately.