The nurse asks the parents of a child about the family health history. The father asks the nurse why she needs this information. The nurse would explain that the family health history is gathered for what reason?
Identifying risk factors in families decreases the child’s risk of developing the same conditions or health problems.
By establishing family behavior, the nurse forces the parents to alter their care of their child and make them healthier.
The nurse needs to know everything about a family to take care of the child.
The number of family members that have a certain health problem will help the nurse know if the child will have the same problem.
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A reason: Family health history identifies genetic and environmental risk factors, enabling preventive measures to reduce the child’s likelihood of developing similar conditions. This aligns with pediatric health assessment goals, making it the correct explanation for gathering family health history data during the clinical encounter.
Choice B reason: Family history does not force parental behavior changes but informs risk assessment. Suggesting coercion is inaccurate, as the goal is prevention through awareness, making this incorrect compared to identifying risk factors as the primary reason for collecting health history from the parents.
Choice C reason: Needing to know “everything” is overly broad and impractical. Family health history specifically targets relevant risk factors for the child’s health, not all family details, making this vague and incorrect for the focused purpose of gathering targeted medical history during the assessment.
Choice D reason: The number of affected family members informs risk but does not definitively predict the child’s health outcomes. Identifying risk factors for prevention is the broader goal, making this too narrow and incorrect for the primary reason for collecting family health history in pediatric care.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Eating with family may encourage variety but does not address the normalcy of food jags in 6-year-olds. Reassuring about their transient nature reduces caregiver stress, making this less direct and incorrect compared to normalizing the child’s selective eating behavior for the concerned caregiver.
Choice B reason: Insisting on variety at every meal may escalate mealtime stress, as food jags are normal and temporary in 6-year-olds. Acknowledging their common occurrence is more supportive, making this pressuring and incorrect for addressing the caregiver’s nutritional concern about the child’s eating habits.
Choice C reason: Food jags, where a child fixates on one food, are common at age 6 and typically resolve naturally. Reassuring the caregiver reduces anxiety and aligns with pediatric nutrition guidance, making this the prioritized response to address concerns about the child’s nutrition and eating patterns.
Choice D reason: Discouraging food preferences risks mealtime conflicts, as food jags are developmentally normal. Normalizing their temporary nature supports the caregiver without forcing the child, making this unhelpful and incorrect compared to reassuring about the common, transient behavior in 6-year-olds.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Asking about family size is irrelevant, as growth norms are based on population standards, not family stature. The toddler’s 6-pound gain and 2.5-inch growth are normal for a 2-year-old, making this unhelpful and incorrect compared to reassuring based on standard growth parameters for toddlers.
Choice B reason: The child’s growth (6 pounds, 2.5 inches) is within normal limits for a 2-year-old, so stating it is less than expected is inaccurate. Gathering nutritional history is unnecessary without growth concerns, making this incorrect compared to reassuring the mother about normal development in her child.
Choice C reason: Requiring a follow-up in 3 months is unnecessary, as the toddler’s growth is normal (6 pounds, 2.5 inches in a year). Reassuring the mother addresses her concerns directly, avoiding unwarranted visits, making this incorrect for responding to a toddler with standard growth patterns.
Choice D reason: A 6-pound (2.7 kg) weight gain and 2.5-inch (6.4 cm) height increase are within normal limits for a 2-year-old, per pediatric growth charts. Reassuring the mother alleviates anxiety and aligns with evidence-based growth standards, making this the correct response to her concerns about growth.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.