Which are potentially worrisome adverse effects associated with proton pump inhibitor use in older patients? (Select all that apply)
Gastric cancer
Osteoporosis
Vitamin and mineral deficiencies
Headaches
Medication interactions
Correct Answer : B,C,E
Choice A reason: Long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has a weak, controversial association with gastric cancer due to hypergastrinemia, but evidence is inconclusive. In older patients, risks like osteoporosis and nutrient deficiencies are more established and immediate concerns, making this choice less consistently worrisome compared to others.
Choice B reason: PPIs reduce gastric acid, impairing calcium absorption, which increases osteoporosis risk in older patients. Chronic use is linked to decreased bone density and higher fracture risk, particularly in the elderly, due to disrupted mineral homeostasis, making this a significant and correct adverse effect to monitor.
Choice C reason: PPIs inhibit acid production, reducing absorption of vitamin B12, magnesium, and iron, leading to deficiencies in older patients. These can cause anemia, neurological issues, or hypomagnesemia, which are particularly concerning in the elderly due to comorbidities, making this a correct and critical adverse effect.
Choice D reason: Headaches are a possible PPI side effect but are less common and less severe in older patients compared to osteoporosis, nutrient deficiencies, or drug interactions. They don’t pose a significant long-term risk or require specific monitoring, making this choice incorrect for major concerns.
Choice E reason: PPIs interact with drugs like clopidogrel, reducing its efficacy by inhibiting CYP2C19, and affect absorption of drugs requiring acidic environments. In older patients with polypharmacy, these interactions increase risks of adverse outcomes, making this a significant and correct concern for PPI use.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Administering captopril risks angioedema, as the patient’s history of tongue and lip swelling with enalapril (another ACE inhibitor) suggests a class effect due to bradykinin accumulation. This is potentially life-threatening, requiring avoidance, not monitoring, making this choice unsafe and incorrect.
Choice B reason: Fosinopril, another ACE inhibitor, carries the same angioedema risk as captopril and enalapril due to similar bradykinin effects. Switching within the same drug class doesn’t address the patient’s history of adverse reactions, making this choice inappropriate and potentially dangerous.
Choice C reason: Holding captopril and notifying the provider is correct, as the patient’s history of angioedema with enalapril indicates a high risk with captopril, another ACE inhibitor. Alternative classes (e.g., ARBs) should be considered to avoid life-threatening reactions, making this the safest and correct action.
Choice D reason: Angioedema (tongue and lip swelling) is a serious, potentially fatal side effect of ACE inhibitors, not benign. Reassuring the patient minimizes the risk, which could delay intervention. The history warrants avoiding captopril and consulting the provider, making this choice incorrect and unsafe.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: A sodium level of 140 mEq/L is within the normal range (135-145 mEq/L). While furosemide can cause hyponatremia, this value is not concerning. Hypokalemia is a greater risk with furosemide and digoxin, as it potentiates digoxin toxicity, making this choice less critical than potassium.
Choice B reason: Oxygen saturation of 95% is normal (95-100%). Crackles suggest pulmonary edema, but this saturation doesn’t indicate severe hypoxia requiring immediate action. Hypokalemia poses a greater risk with digoxin and furosemide, as it increases toxicity potential, making this choice less concerning.
Choice C reason: A potassium level of 3.0 mEq/L (normal: 3.5-5.0 mEq/L) indicates hypokalemia, exacerbated by furosemide’s diuretic effect. In digoxin use, low potassium increases cardiac toxicity risk, causing arrhythmias, especially with an irregular heart rate noted, making this the most concerning value requiring immediate attention.
Choice D reason: A blood glucose level of 100 mg/dL is normal (70-110 mg/dL fasting). It’s unrelated to digoxin or furosemide’s primary risks (e.g., electrolyte imbalances, arrhythmias). Hypokalemia is a more immediate concern due to its synergistic toxicity with digoxin, making this choice less critical.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.