Rationale for Choice A:

Arranging for a bedside commode can be helpful for patients who have difficulty ambulating to the bathroom. However, it is not the most effective intervention for preventing falls in an ambulatory and independent patient. In fact, it could potentially increase the risk of falls if the patient attempts to use the commode without assistance or if they become disoriented in the dark.

Research has shown that bedside commodes are associated with an increased risk of falls in hospitalized patients. This is because patients may try to get out of bed to use the commode without assistance, or they may become disoriented in the dark and fall.

Additionally, bedside commodes can be a tripping hazard, especially for patients with impaired mobility.

Rationale for Choice B:

Ensuring the bathroom light is kept on during the night can help to reduce the risk of falls by making it easier for the patient to see. However, it is not the most effective intervention for preventing falls.

Patients may still fall even if the bathroom light is on, especially if they are weak, unsteady, or have impaired vision. Additionally, keeping the bathroom light on all night can disrupt the patient's sleep, which can also increase the risk of falls.

Rationale for Choice C:

Using side rails to keep the patient in bed is not an effective intervention for preventing falls. In fact, it can actually increase the risk of falls by making it more difficult for the patient to get out of bed safely.

Patients may try to climb over the side rails, which can lead to falls.

Additionally, side rails can restrict the patient's movement and make them feel trapped, which can lead to agitation and an increased risk of falls.

Rationale for Choice D:

Implementing a toileting schedule is the most effective intervention for preventing falls in an ambulatory and independent patient. This is because it helps to reduce the patient's need to get out of bed at night to use the bathroom.

When a patient has a scheduled time to toilet, they are less likely to try to get out of bed on their own and risk a fall. Additionally, a toileting schedule can help to prevent incontinence, which can also lead to falls.

Choice A rationale:
Addresses the family's fear directly: By demonstrating how to avoid spreading the disease, the nurse directly addresses the family's primary concern, which is the fear of contracting the infection. This proactive approach provides education and reassurance, empowering the family to make informed decisions about visitation.
Promotes understanding and adherence to precautions: Clear instruction on how to don and doff personal protective equipment, hand hygiene techniques, and other infection control measures increases the likelihood that the family will follow the precautions correctly, reducing the risk of transmission.
Empowers the family to make informed choices: By providing knowledge and skills, the nurse enables the family to feel more confident in their ability to visit safely. This sense of control can help to alleviate anxiety and promote positive coping mechanisms.
Facilitates open communication and trust: The demonstration creates an opportunity for the nurse to answer questions, address concerns, and build rapport with the family. This open dialogue can foster trust and collaboration, which are essential for effective care.
Choice B rationale:
May provide false reassurance: While it's important to offer support and hope, it's not always possible to guarantee that family members will not contract the infection. Absolute reassurances could potentially lead to complacency or disregard for precautions, increasing the risk of transmission.
Fails to address the need for education: Simply stating that the family won't get sick doesn't provide them with the knowledge and skills needed to protect themselves and the client. This lack of understanding could result in accidental transmission.
Choice C rationale:
May pressure the family: Encouraging visitation without addressing underlying fears and concerns could be perceived as pressure, leading to resentment, anxiety, or even avoidance. It's important to respect the family's decision-making process and provide support regardless of their choice.
Doesn't prioritize safety: While emotional support is important, the primary focus should be on ensuring the safety of both the client and the family. Encouraging visitation without proper education and precautions could compromise safety.
Choice D rationale:
Focuses on compliance rather than understanding: Informing the family about legal mandates may come across as authoritarian and could potentially increase anxiety or resistance. It's more effective to focus on the rationale behind the precautions and emphasize their role in protecting both the client and the family.

Misses an opportunity to build trust: Simply stating the rules without engaging in dialogue may hinder open communication and trust-building. Taking a collaborative approach and addressing concerns can lead to better understanding and adherence to precautions.