A caregiver who works in the hospital brings his 9-year-old son to the emergency room with a spiral fracture of the tibia. The caregiver reports that the injury occurred when the boy’s 5-year-old sister hit him with a wooden bat. The injury is inconsistent with an impact and with the sister’s strength. Which of the following would be appropriate for the nurse to do in this situation?
Leave the treatment area and call the police.
Tell the hospital administrator so that the hospital can take any necessary action.
Tell the caregiver that the story is not plausible and ask what really happened.
Leave the treatment area and call the social services department in the hospital.
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: Calling the police directly bypasses hospital protocol for suspected abuse. Contacting social services allows for a multidisciplinary evaluation of the inconsistent spiral fracture story, ensuring appropriate investigation, making this premature and incorrect compared to following hospital child protection procedures for the child.
Choice B reason: Informing the hospital administrator is less direct than contacting social services, which is trained to handle suspected abuse cases. The inconsistent injury story requires specialized assessment, making this less appropriate and incorrect for addressing the immediate concern of potential child maltreatment in the ER.
Choice C reason: Confronting the caregiver risks escalating the situation and may hinder investigation. Reporting to social services ensures a professional evaluation of the implausible injury explanation, aligning with child protection protocols, making this confrontational approach incorrect for managing suspected abuse in the hospital setting.
Choice D reason: Calling social services is the appropriate action for a spiral fracture with an inconsistent story, as it suggests possible abuse. Social services can investigate and coordinate with authorities, aligning with hospital protocols for child maltreatment, making this the correct response to ensure the child’s safety.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Assuming the girlfriend is overly dependent lacks evidence and may alienate the teen. Encouraging balance with schoolwork while respecting his relationship fosters autonomy, making this judgmental and incorrect compared to supporting his developmental need for relationships while ensuring academic responsibilities are met.
Choice B reason: Imposing a strict schedule assumes immaturity and undermines a 16-year-old’s autonomy, potentially causing resistance. Allowing girlfriend time after schoolwork respects his developmental stage, making this overly controlling and incorrect compared to fostering independence while addressing the parents’ concerns about his behavior.
Choice C reason: Discouraging an intimate relationship ignores the 16-year-old’s developmental need for close bonds, which is normal. Permitting girlfriend time post-schoolwork balances responsibilities, making this restrictive and incorrect compared to supporting his social growth while ensuring he meets academic and extracurricular obligations.
Choice D reason: At 16, forming close relationships is a key developmental task for future adult bonds. Allowing girlfriend time after schoolwork respects his identity while addressing parental concerns, aligning with adolescent psychosocial development, making this the best suggestion to balance his needs and responsibilities effectively.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Family health history identifies genetic and environmental risk factors, enabling preventive measures to reduce the child’s likelihood of developing similar conditions. This aligns with pediatric health assessment goals, making it the correct explanation for gathering family health history data during the clinical encounter.
Choice B reason: Family history does not force parental behavior changes but informs risk assessment. Suggesting coercion is inaccurate, as the goal is prevention through awareness, making this incorrect compared to identifying risk factors as the primary reason for collecting health history from the parents.
Choice C reason: Needing to know “everything” is overly broad and impractical. Family health history specifically targets relevant risk factors for the child’s health, not all family details, making this vague and incorrect for the focused purpose of gathering targeted medical history during the assessment.
Choice D reason: The number of affected family members informs risk but does not definitively predict the child’s health outcomes. Identifying risk factors for prevention is the broader goal, making this too narrow and incorrect for the primary reason for collecting family health history in pediatric care.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.