A client has a cognitive impairment and is unable to comprehend pain scales effectively.
Which pain assessment tool would be most appropriate for this client?
FLACC Scale.
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The Correct Answer is A
FLACC Scale.
Choice A rationale:
The FLACC Scale, as previously mentioned, is a suitable pain assessment tool for clients who may have cognitive impairments and cannot effectively comprehend more complex pain scales.
It relies on observable behaviors, making it suitable for individuals who cannot express their pain verbally or understand more intricate pain assessment methods.
Choice B rationale:
The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, while effective for many individuals, may still require some level of comprehension to point to the appropriate face on the scale.
It may not be the best choice for individuals with severe cognitive impairments.
Choice C rationale:
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and
Choice D rationale:
the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both require an understanding of numbers and abstract concepts, which may be challenging for clients with cognitive impairments.
These scales are not the most appropriate choice for this population.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
The child is experiencing moderate pain.
Choice A rationale:
A rating of '7' on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) typically indicates moderate pain.
The NRS is commonly used to assess pain in individuals who can communicate their pain level numerically.
The scale usually ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst possible pain.
In this context, a score of 7 suggests that the child is experiencing moderate pain, as they have rated their pain above the midpoint of the scale.
Choice B rationale:
A rating of '7' on the NRS does not indicate severe pain.
Severe pain would usually be associated with a higher score, often closer to the upper limit of the scale (e.g., 9 or 10)
Therefore, choice B is not the correct interpretation in this case.
Choice C rationale:
A rating of '7' on the NRS is higher than what is typically considered mild pain.
Mild pain would typically be represented by a lower score, such as 1 to 3 on the NRS.
Therefore, choice C is not the correct interpretation.
Choice D rationale:
A rating of '7' on the NRS clearly indicates that the child is experiencing pain.
Choice D, which states that the child is not experiencing any pain, is not the correct interpretation based on the provided pain rating.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
If the child rates their pain as 3 on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), this numerical value represents mild pain.
The NRS typically uses a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable.
A rating of 3 falls on the lower end of the scale, signifying mild discomfort or pain.
Choice B rationale:
An NRS rating of 3 is not considered moderate pain.
It is more in the range of mild pain.
Moderate pain would typically be rated higher on the scale, such as 4 to 6.
Choice C rationale:
An NRS rating of 3 is not indicative of severe pain.
Severe pain would typically be rated much higher on the scale, around 7 or higher.
Choice D rationale:
An NRS rating of 3 does not represent no pain.
It indicates the presence of pain, albeit at a relatively mild level.
A rating of 0 on the NRS would signify the absence of pain.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
