A mother brings her 2-year-old child to the pediatrician’s office, voicing concerns about her toddler’s growth over the last year. According to the child’s records, the toddler has gained 6 pounds (2.7 kg) and grown 2.5 inches (6.4 cm) since the child’s last visit a year ago. How should the nurse respond to this mother’s concerns?
Ask the mother if there are other small people in her family.
Tell her that her child’s growth is less than expected and gather a nutritional history on the child.
Tell the mother that she needs to return to the pediatrician’s office in 3 months to re-weigh the child and measure his height for any changes.
Inform the mother that her toddler’s growth is within normal limits and there is nothing to be worried about.
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: Asking about family size is irrelevant, as growth norms are based on population standards, not family stature. The toddler’s 6-pound gain and 2.5-inch growth are normal for a 2-year-old, making this unhelpful and incorrect compared to reassuring based on standard growth parameters for toddlers.
Choice B reason: The child’s growth (6 pounds, 2.5 inches) is within normal limits for a 2-year-old, so stating it is less than expected is inaccurate. Gathering nutritional history is unnecessary without growth concerns, making this incorrect compared to reassuring the mother about normal development in her child.
Choice C reason: Requiring a follow-up in 3 months is unnecessary, as the toddler’s growth is normal (6 pounds, 2.5 inches in a year). Reassuring the mother addresses her concerns directly, avoiding unwarranted visits, making this incorrect for responding to a toddler with standard growth patterns.
Choice D reason: A 6-pound (2.7 kg) weight gain and 2.5-inch (6.4 cm) height increase are within normal limits for a 2-year-old, per pediatric growth charts. Reassuring the mother alleviates anxiety and aligns with evidence-based growth standards, making this the correct response to her concerns about growth.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Socializing with healthy peers may motivate but doesn’t directly teach self-care skills for chronic illness. A contract with rewards engages the child actively, making this less focused and incorrect compared to a structured strategy ensuring school-aged children achieve treatment goals effectively.
Choice B reason: Co-writing a contract with rewards engages the child in setting and achieving self-care goals, fostering responsibility and motivation. This aligns with pediatric chronic illness management, making it the most effective strategy to help school-aged children master treatment goals with caregiver involvement.
Choice C reason: Reinforcing the importance of goals educates but lacks active engagement compared to a reward-based contract. Contracts promote accountability, making this less effective and incorrect for directly helping chronically ill children achieve self-care treatment goals in a structured, motivating way.
Choice D reason: A sticker chart tracks progress but is less collaborative than a contract, which involves the child in goal-setting. Contracts better foster ownership, making this less engaging and incorrect compared to the co-written contract strategy for achieving self-care goals in school-aged children.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Setting a good example by always wearing a seat belt models safe behavior, which children are likely to emulate. This prioritizes consistent safety habits, aligning with pediatric safety education principles, making it the most effective instruction for promoting car safety in families during a health fair presentation.
Choice B reason: Rewarding with candy for seat belt use may encourage compliance but risks unhealthy eating habits and extrinsic motivation. Modeling seat belt use fosters intrinsic safety habits, making this less effective and incorrect compared to the nurse’s priority of setting a consistent example for car safety.
Choice C reason: Stopping the car for unbuckled restraints addresses behavior but may be impractical and unsafe on busy roads. Modeling seat belt use prevents issues by reinforcing norms, making this reactive approach less prioritized and incorrect for the primary car safety instruction in a family setting.
Choice D reason: Explaining seat belt laws may inform but is less effective for young children who respond better to role modeling than legal consequences. Parental example drives behavior, making this less impactful and incorrect compared to prioritizing consistent seat belt use by adults in the family.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.