A nurse is caring for a client who has a terminal illness and wishes to discuss hospice care. Which of the following statements by the nurse demonstrates veracity?

A) Ask the provider to give consent for the transfusion:

The provider cannot override the decision made by the client's designated healthcare proxy. Even if the provider were to give consent for the transfusion, it would not be ethically or legally appropriate to proceed with the treatment against the expressed wishes of the client's healthcare proxy.

B) Discuss taking guardianship of the client with the facility administration:

Seeking guardianship of the client would be an extreme measure and may not be necessary or appropriate in this situation. Guardianship is typically pursued when there are concerns about an individual's capacity to make decisions for themselves and when there is no designated healthcare proxy available to make decisions on their behalf. In this case, the client has a designated healthcare proxy, and it is more appropriate to respect the daughter's decision as the client's authorized representative.

C) Respect the daughter's decision to refuse the transfusion:

In situations where a client has designated a durable power of attorney for healthcare, the individual designated as the healthcare proxy has the legal authority to make healthcare decisions on behalf of the client, including the refusal of treatment. In this case, the daughter, acting as the client's healthcare proxy, has refused the blood transfusion for her mother. It is important for the nurse to respect and honor the daughter's decision, as it aligns with the client's previously documented wishes.

D) Encourage the daughter to let her mother have the transfusion:

While it is understandable that the nurse may want to advocate for the client's well-being, in this situation, the daughter's decision as the client's healthcare proxy must be respected. Encouraging the daughter to change her decision would not be appropriate if it goes against her understanding of what is in her mother's best interests and the client's previously documented wishes.

A) Asking a staff member from another unit to complete the evaluation: While involving someone from another unit may offer an external perspective, it may not necessarily ensure impartiality. The evaluator should have direct knowledge of the nurse's performance to provide a fair assessment.

B) Focusing primarily on areas that need improvement: This approach may lead to a biased evaluation, as it overlooks the nurse's strengths and positive contributions. A comprehensive evaluation should consider both areas of strength and areas needing improvement to provide a balanced assessment.

C) Discussing the evaluation with the nurse manager: Consulting with the nurse manager about the evaluation could introduce bias, especially if the manager has preconceived notions about the nurse being evaluated. Peer evaluations should aim to be independent of managerial influence to maintain impartiality.

D) Linking the evaluation to predetermined standards: This is the correct approach to ensure impartiality in peer evaluation. By using predetermined standards or criteria, the evaluation process becomes objective and transparent. Evaluators can assess the nurse's performance against established benchmarks, reducing the influence of personal bias.