A nurse is discussing the process of evidence-based practice (EBP). Which of the following sources should the nurse identify as being examples of credible sources of information? (Select All that Apply.)

Explanation:

A. "I promise I won't tell anyone about this."

This statement is not appropriate because nurses are mandated reporters of suspected child abuse. Promising confidentiality in cases of abuse goes against legal and ethical responsibilities. The nurse must report suspected abuse to the appropriate authorities for the safety and well-being of the child.

B. "Your family is bad for doing this to you."

This statement is judgmental and may make the child feel guilty or conflicted about their family. It is essential to avoid blaming or shaming language when addressing a child who has been abused. The focus should be on providing support, validation, and appropriate intervention.

C. "Let's discuss what you have told me with your family members."

This statement is not appropriate because it suggests involving the family members in the discussion of abuse, which can potentially put the child at risk of further harm. It's essential to prioritize the safety of the child and follow appropriate reporting procedures rather than involving potentially abusive family members in discussions about abuse.

D. "It is not your fault that this happened."

This statement is appropriate and supportive. It reassures the child that they are not to blame for the abuse they have experienced. It acknowledges the child's feelings and helps them understand that they are not responsible for the actions of the abuser. This statement can provide comfort and validation to the child during a difficult time.

Explanation:

A. Open access peer-reviewed articles must be purchased by the user.

This statement is not accurate. Open access peer-reviewed articles are freely available to users without the need for purchase. They are published under an open access model, making them accessible to anyone with an internet connection.

B. Peer-reviewed articles are not considered scholarly sources of evidence.

This statement is incorrect. Peer-reviewed articles are indeed considered scholarly sources of evidence. They undergo a rigorous peer-review process where experts in the field review the content for accuracy, validity, and reliability before publication.

C. Editorial opinion articles by journalists can be as relevant as peer-reviewed articles.

This statement is generally not accurate in the context of evidence-based practice. While editorial opinion articles may offer valuable insights and perspectives, they are not subjected to the same level of scrutiny and review as peer-reviewed articles. Peer-reviewed articles are typically considered more reliable and credible sources of evidence in healthcare and academic settings.

D. Peer-reviewed articles have been through laborious review by other professionals.

This statement is correct. Peer-reviewed articles undergo a thorough review process by other professionals in the same field before they are accepted for publication. This review process ensures that the research and information presented in the article meet high standards of quality, accuracy, and validity.