A nurse is planning care for an adolescent who is being admitted to an acute care unit following a suicide attempt. Which of the following interventions should the nurse identify as the priority?

Choice A reason: Mild delirium involves acute confusion and impaired judgment due to cerebral dysfunction, often from metabolic or infectious causes. Accompanying the client ensures safety, as disorientation increases wandering or injury risk. Supervision mitigates risks from altered cognition while allowing mobility, supporting cerebral recovery without exacerbating confusion.

Choice B reason: Restricting the client to the unit may increase agitation, as delirium’s neurochemical imbalances, like acetylcholine deficiency, heighten restlessness. While safety is critical, blanket restriction ignores the potential benefits of supervised movement, which can reduce stress and improve cerebral perfusion, making this less appropriate than supervised accompaniment.

Choice C reason: Assessing motives may clarify intent but delays addressing immediate safety in delirium, where confusion stems from cerebral dysfunction, such as hypoxia or electrolyte imbalance. The client’s impaired judgment requires supervision over exploration of motives, as disorientation increases risk of harm, making this a secondary action.

Choice D reason: Allowing an unsupervised walk is unsafe in delirium, as acute cognitive impairment from neurotransmitter imbalances or metabolic disturbances increases wandering or injury risk. Without supervision, the client may become disoriented or lost, exacerbating cerebral stress. Accompanied walks better balance safety and mobility in this condition.

Choice A reason: Responding positively to flattery risks reinforcing manipulative behavior and does not address potential underlying distress. The client’s statement may reflect emotional dysregulation or suicidal ideation, common in psychiatric conditions with serotonin imbalances. This response fails to probe for serious neurobiological risks, missing a critical assessment opportunity.

Choice B reason: Assuming the client wants something is confrontational and dismissive, ignoring potential suicidal ideation or emotional distress. The statement may reflect serotonin-driven mood instability or a cry for help, requiring sensitive exploration. This response risks alienating the client, missing neurobiological cues for underlying psychiatric concerns.

Choice C reason: Asking about suicidal thoughts is appropriate, as the client’s statement may signal ideation, linked to serotonin dysregulation and prefrontal cortex deficits. Such expressions can indicate despair or intent in psychiatric conditions, necessitating direct assessment to ensure safety and address potential neurobiological imbalances driving suicidal behavior.

Choice D reason: Dismissing the statement as insincere ignores potential distress signals, such as suicidal ideation or emotional dysregulation from serotonin imbalances. This response fails to engage the client’s underlying neurobiological state, risking missed opportunities to assess serious psychiatric concerns and provide appropriate intervention or support.