An occupational health nurse is implementing some tertiary levels of prevention in the workplace. Which of the following interventions are tertiary interventions?

Choice A reason: Studies show a minimal increase in confidence levels among mentored youth
While mentorship can have various benefits, the statement that it shows only a minimal increase in confidence levels is not entirely accurate. Research indicates that mentorship programs can significantly boost self-esteem and self-confidence among youth. However, this choice does not directly address the primary rationale for referring a disruptive student to a mentorship program.

Choice B reason: Students who are mentored are more likely to attain educational success
This statement is supported by extensive research. Mentorship programs have been shown to improve academic performance, increase high school graduation rates, and enhance overall educational aspirations. Mentored students often receive guidance, support, and motivation that help them succeed academically. This rationale aligns well with the goal of addressing disruptive behavior in school by providing positive role models and support systems.

Choice C reason: Mentored teens tend to recover better from bullying experiences
Mentorship can indeed help teens recover from bullying by providing emotional support and guidance. Mentors can offer a safe space for mentees to discuss their experiences and develop coping strategies. However, while this is a valid benefit of mentorship, it is not the primary rationale for referring a disruptive student to a mentorship program.

Choice D reason: Mentorship will help the child avoid social activities during the teen years
This statement is incorrect. Mentorship programs aim to encourage positive social interactions and engagement in constructive activities. They do not seek to isolate children from social activities but rather to guide them towards healthier and more productive social engagements. Therefore, this rationale does not support the referral for mentorship.

Choice A Reason:
The expansion of the program within the Hispanic community is indeed an important initiative for many community health programs, including the Nurse-Family Partnership. However, it is not the standout aspect of the impact report in question. The focus on public-private partnerships is more prominently highlighted in the report, reflecting a broader strategy to enhance program reach and effectiveness through diverse collaborations.

Choice B Reason:
The statement that the impact report is kept private is incorrect. Impact reports are typically public documents designed to showcase the achievements and progress of a program to stakeholders, funders, and the community. Keeping such a report private would defeat its purpose of transparency and accountability.

Choice C Reason:
Expansion of public-private partnerships is a key initiative. This is a standout aspect of the Nurse-Family Partnership impact report. Public-private partnerships are crucial for scaling up health programs, securing funding, and integrating services across different sectors. These partnerships enable the program to leverage resources, expertise, and networks from both public and private entities, thereby enhancing its impact and sustainability.

Choice D Reason:
The statement that the impact report focuses solely on local partnerships is not accurate. While local partnerships are important, the report emphasizes a broader strategy that includes both local and wider public-private partnerships. This comprehensive approach ensures that the program can address community needs more effectively and sustainably.