A nurse is looking at a Nurse-Family Partnership impact report as an example of a community impact report. Which of the following stands out as an aspect of this impact report?

Choice A: Nominal Group Planning is Best Used in Situations Where the Final Decision is Made by the Nurse Leading the Team
This statement is incorrect. Nominal group planning, also known as the nominal group technique (NGT), is designed to facilitate group decision-making and ensure that all members have an equal opportunity to contribute their ideas. It is not intended for situations where a single individual, such as the nurse leading the team, makes the final decision. Instead, NGT aims to gather diverse perspectives and reach a collective agreement on priorities.

Choice B: Nominal Group Planning is Used for Group Exploration to Allow for the Exchange of Dialogue and Opinions by the Stakeholders
This statement is correct. Nominal group planning is a structured method for group brainstorming that encourages contributions from everyone and facilitates quick agreement on the relative importance of issues, problems, or solutions. It allows for the exchange of dialogue and opinions among stakeholders, ensuring that all voices are heard and considered in the decision-making process.

Choice C: Nominal Group Planning Involves Group Consensus Before Prioritizing Data
While nominal group planning does involve group discussion and the sharing of ideas, it does not necessarily require full consensus before prioritizing data. Instead, it uses a voting system to rank the ideas based on their importance. This method ensures that the most critical issues are identified and prioritized, even if there is not complete agreement among all participants.

Choice D: Nominal Group Planning is Authoritarian with the Key Stakeholder Dictating Prioritization of Community Data
This statement is incorrect. Nominal group planning is not an authoritarian process. It is designed to be democratic and inclusive, allowing all group members to participate equally in the decision-making process. The key stakeholder does not dictate the prioritization of community data; instead, the group collectively determines the priorities through discussion and voting.

Choice A Reason:
Research indicating that a screening is not warranted at this time and may be harmful aligns with a Grade D recommendation from the USPSTF. Grade D recommendations suggest that the service has no net benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits, and therefore, it should be discouraged.

Choice B Reason:
A Grade C recommendation from the USPSTF means that the service should be selectively offered or provided to individual patients based on professional judgment and patient preferences. There is at least moderate certainty that the net benefit is small. This means that while there is some benefit, it is not substantial enough to recommend the service for all individuals.

Choice C Reason:
The statement that there is not enough evidence to determine if a screening is helpful or not corresponds to a Grade I (Insufficient) recommendation. This grade indicates that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of the service. More research is needed to make a definitive recommendation.

Choice D Reason:
Research indicating that a screening exam is beneficial aligns with a Grade A or B recommendation. Grade A recommendations suggest high certainty that the net benefit is substantial, while Grade B recommendations suggest high certainty that the net benefit is moderate or there is moderate certainty that the net benefit is moderate to substantial.