An older adult client who was a veteran of World War II has just died. His widowed wife did not work and does not have sufficient funds to afford supplemental Medicare insurance. You would recommend which one of the following?

A. Because a conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative, a court hearing is not required.

Explanation: This statement is not accurate. Conservatorships are legal arrangements that involve the appointment of a conservator to manage the financial affairs and assets of an individual who is unable to do so themselves. While conservatorships may be necessary for the protection of the individual, they are not automatically considered the least restrictive alternative, and a court hearing is typically required to establish one.

B. The most legally restricting way individuals and property can be handled are through conservatorships and guardianships.

Explanation: This statement is partially true. Conservatorships and guardianships are legal mechanisms that grant authority to individuals (conservators and guardians, respectively) to manage the affairs of someone who is unable to do so themselves. While they involve legal restrictions, whether they are the most restrictive or not can depend on the specific details of the arrangement and the jurisdiction.

C. A conservatorship entails control over property, whereas a guardianship entails control over the person.

Explanation: This statement is true. In general, a conservatorship focuses on managing the financial affairs and assets of an individual, while a guardianship involves decision-making authority over personal and healthcare matters. The roles and responsibilities of conservators and guardians may vary by jurisdiction, but the distinction between control over property and control over the person is a common principle.

D. Conservators cannot be members of the conservatee's (client's) family.

Explanation: This statement is not universally true. In many cases, family members can be appointed as conservators. The court will typically consider the best interests of the individual in need of protection when appointing a conservator, and a family member may be deemed suitable if they can fulfill the responsibilities of the role. The specific rules regarding who can be a conservator may vary by jurisdiction.

A. Use of resistance bands
Explanation: Resistance band exercises can improve strength and flexibility, but they may not specifically address balance as directly as Tai Chi or certain yoga poses.

B. Stretching
Explanation: Stretching exercises contribute to flexibility and can be part of a well-rounded exercise routine. While they can be beneficial, other exercises like Tai Chi and yoga may have a more specific focus on balance improvement.

C. Tai Chi
Explanation: Tai Chi is a low-impact exercise that emphasizes slow, controlled movements, weight shifting, and mindfulness. It has been shown to improve balance and reduce the risk of falls, making it suitable for individuals at high risk.

D. Yoga
Explanation: Yoga incorporates balance, flexibility, and strength exercises. Certain yoga poses can help improve balance and stability, making it beneficial for individuals at risk for falls.

E. Range of Motion (ROM) activities
Explanation: Range of motion activities helps maintain joint flexibility and can contribute to improved balance. Encouraging the client to perform gentle range of motion exercises can be beneficial.