One hundred families in a community refuse to have their children immunized because of religious beliefs. When one documented case of whooping cough occurs within this aggregate, which intervention should the nurse implement?
Immunize all children under age 5 in the one hundred family aggregate.
Immunize all members of the one hundred families.
Quarantine the one hundred family aggregate.
Quarantine all family members of the child with whooping cough.
The Correct Answer is D
A) Immunize all children under age 5 in the one hundred family aggregate:
Immunization would be a standard preventive measure to control the spread of whooping cough, but in this case, the immediate focus should be on managing the current outbreak. Ensuring that the child with whooping cough and their close contacts are managed appropriately is crucial, rather than preemptively immunizing all children in the aggregate without addressing the existing case.
B) Immunize all members of the one hundred families:
While immunization is essential in preventing whooping cough, implementing this measure without considering the specific outbreak context and the families' religious beliefs might not be feasible or immediately effective. Additionally, managing the outbreak and containing its spread is the immediate priority.
C) Quarantine the one hundred family aggregate:
Quarantining an entire aggregate of families, especially when the infection is present in only one documented case, would be excessive and likely impractical. Quarantine measures should be targeted to those directly exposed or infected to prevent further spread.
D) Quarantine all family members of the child with whooping cough:
Quarantining all family members of the child with whooping cough is the most appropriate immediate intervention. This targeted quarantine helps prevent the spread of the infection within the affected household and controls the outbreak. It addresses the specific exposure and containment needs of the situation effectively.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A) Evaluate the teacher's ability to identify pediculosis capitis 2 months after initiation of the program:
Evaluating the teachers’ ability to identify pediculosis capitis is important for ongoing surveillance, but it does not directly measure the effectiveness of the program in reducing the prevalence of the condition. This action focuses more on teacher training rather than the program's overall impact.
B) Measure the prevalence of pediculosis capitis among the children after four months:
Measuring the prevalence of pediculosis capitis among children after the implementation of the program is the most effective way to evaluate the program's success. By comparing the prevalence before and after the program, the nurse can assess whether the interventions (educational pamphlets and regular assessments) have led to a reduction in cases.
C) Survey parents 3 weeks after pamphlets are sent home to assess their understanding of the condition:
Surveying parents about their understanding of pediculosis capitis is useful for evaluating the reach and impact of the educational component. However, it does not directly measure the effectiveness of the program in reducing the actual prevalence of pediculosis capitis among children.
D) Conduct an initial examination of each child in the school to obtain baseline data:
Conducting an initial examination provides valuable baseline data on the prevalence of pediculosis capitis before the program begins. However, this action alone does not evaluate the effectiveness of the program; it must be followed by assessments after the program’s implementation to determine if there has been a reduction in cases.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
A) Fasting blood glucose average readings were 20% lower at the end of the classes:
This outcome measure directly evaluates the effectiveness of the diabetes education classes. A significant reduction in fasting blood glucose levels indicates that the classes had a positive impact on the clients' diabetes management, reflecting the practical success of the educational interventions.
B) Discussion of food exchanges and calories was a well-attended class:
While class attendance is a positive indicator of interest, it does not measure the actual effectiveness of the classes in improving diabetes management. Attendance alone does not confirm that the information was effectively applied or that it led to improved health outcomes.
C) Demonstrating the use of a blood glucose meter was an effective teaching strategy:
Although demonstrating the use of a blood glucose meter is an important teaching strategy, evaluating its effectiveness does not provide a comprehensive measure of the overall impact of the classes. The ultimate goal is to see improvements in health outcomes, such as blood glucose control.
D) Parking convenience for attendees continued to be a major concern:
While logistical issues like parking convenience are important for class accessibility, they do not reflect the effectiveness of the educational content in improving health outcomes. The focus should be on measurable changes in clients' health status, such as blood glucose levels.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.