The practical nurse (PN) observes an unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP) bathing a bedfast client with the bed in the high fowlers position. Which action should the PN take?
Assume care of the client immediately.
Remain in the room to supervise the UAP.
Instruct the UAP to lower the bed for safety.
Determine if the UAP would like assistance.
The Correct Answer is C
The correct answer is choice C: Instruct the UAP to lower the bed for safety.
Choice C rationale: When bathing a bedfast client, the bed should be in a flat or low position to reduce the risk of the client sliding down, falling, or experiencing discomfort or injury. By instructing the UAP to lower the bed, the PN ensures client safety during the bathing process.
Choice A rationale: Assuming care of the client immediately might be unnecessary. The PN should first address the safety concern and then determine if additional intervention is needed.
Choice B rationale: While supervising the UAP may be appropriate in certain situations, the priority in this case is to address the immediate safety concern by instructing the UAP to lower the bed. The PN can then decide if supervision or assistance is required.
Choice D rationale: Determining if the UAP would like assistance is considerate, but it is not the priority in this situation. Ensuring client safety by lowering the bed should be addressed first. The PN can then assess whether the UAP needs any help or guidance.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is ["A","B","C","E"]
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
The client’s presentation of a noticeable facial droop and garbled speech are classic symptoms of a stroke. These symptoms indicate that the brain is not receiving enough oxygen, which can lead to permanent damage if not treated immediately. Therefore, this client requires immediate health interventions.
Choice B rationale:
This choice is identical to Choice A. The client’s noticeable facial droop and garbled speech are indicative of a stroke and require immediate attention.
Choice C rationale:
This choice is also identical to Choices A and B. The client’s symptoms are indicative of a stroke, which is a medical emergency that requires immediate intervention.
Choice D rationale:
While the change in the client’s speech after having a few drinks at a restaurant could be due to alcohol consumption, it could also be a symptom of a stroke, especially when combined with a facial droop. However, this choice does not directly indicate the need for immediate health interventions as it lacks the specificity of the symptoms compared to Choices A, B, and C.
Choice E rationale:
The time of arrival and mode of transportation do not directly indicate the need for immediate health interventions. However, the mention of facial drooping and garbled speech upon arrival at the emergency department reinforces the urgency of the situation, as these are classic symptoms of a stroke. In conclusion, Choices A, B, C, and E all highlight data that indicate the client is in need of immediate health interventions due to potential stroke symptoms. It’s important to note that strokes require immediate medical attention to minimize brain damage and potential complications. Normal ranges for lab parameters would not apply in this scenario as it’s based on clinical observations rather than laboratory findings.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole has a synergistic effect, which means that the two drugs work together to inhibit bacterial growth more effectively than either drug alone. This combination is commonly used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by susceptible bacteria.
Choice B rationale:
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have an additive effect that reduces the dosage and frequency of administration of each drug. Instead, it is prescribed as a fixed combination with specific dosages of each drug.
Choice C rationale:
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have an antagonistic effect that prevents the development of resistance to either drug. In fact, the combination is chosen because it covers a broader spectrum of bacteria and reduces the likelihood of resistance development.
Choice D rationale:
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole does not have a selective effect that targets only the bacteria causing the UTI and spares the normal flora. It affects a wide range of bacteria, including both pathogenic and normal flora.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.