The practical nurse (PN) reports to the charge nurse that a client who is receiving a parenteral nutrition infusion has a capillary glucose of 365 mg/dL (20.3 mmol/L). Which action should the charge nurse implement?

Choice A reason: Upper midabdominal pain described as gnawing and burning is a classic symptom of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). This type of pain is typically located in the epigastric region and is often relieved by eating or taking antacids, which aligns with the presentation of PUD.

Choice B reason: Marked loss of weight and appetite over the last 3 or 4 months can occur in various gastrointestinal conditions, but it is not specific enough to support a diagnosis of PUD. This symptom alone does not provide enough evidence for PUD.

Choice C reason: Severe abdominal cramps and diarrhea after eating spicy foods might indicate irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or another gastrointestinal condition. These symptoms are not typically associated with PUD.

Choice D reason: Frequent use of chewable and liquid antacids for indigestion can indicate chronic gastrointestinal discomfort, but it does not specifically point to PUD. It suggests ongoing gastric issues but lacks specificity for diagnosing PUD.

Choice A reason: Determining if the client has a sliding scale insulin prescription is crucial. A sliding scale insulin regimen can help manage elevated blood glucose levels effectively. In the case of a capillary glucose of 365 mg/dL, prompt intervention is needed to prevent hyperglycaemia-related complications, and insulin administration is the most appropriate immediate action.

Choice B reason: Stopping the infusion until the healthcare provider is notified may not be the best immediate action. While it is essential to address the hyperglycaemia, halting the parenteral nutrition infusion can affect the client's overall nutritional and fluid balance. The focus should be on managing the glucose levels promptly.

Choice C reason: Assessing the client's urinary output for the previous 24 hours is important for monitoring overall fluid status and kidney function, but it does not directly address the immediate need to manage the elevated glucose levels.

Choice D reason: Reviewing the client's record for a history of diabetes mellitus can provide valuable information for long-term management and understanding the client's baseline glucose control. However, it is not the most urgent action in response to an acutely elevated capillary glucose level. Immediate intervention with insulin is needed to address the hyperglycaemia.