What should the nurse anticipate teaching a patient with a new report of heartburn?

Choice A rationale

While alcohol is a known irritant to the gastric lining, it is not the primary cause of peptic ulcer disease. Excessive alcohol consumption contributes to mucosal damage but lacks the direct causative action of Helicobacter pylori, which colonizes the stomach lining and interferes with protective mechanisms, leading to ulcer formation. Alcohol merely exacerbates existing risk factors rather than initiating disease.

Choice B rationale

Helicobacter pylori is the most common cause of peptic ulcer disease globally. Its mechanism involves producing urease, neutralizing stomach acid and enabling bacterial survival. It induces inflammation and mucosal damage, compromising the stomach's protective lining. Persistent infection leads to ulcer formation. This bacterial colonization is implicated in up to 90% of duodenal ulcers, making it the key pathogenic factor in PUD.

Choice C rationale

Smoking is a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease but functions more as an aggravating agent than the primary cause. Tobacco use increases gastric acid secretion and decreases bicarbonate production, weakening mucosal defenses. It also reduces the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, prolonging ulcer disease. However, it does not directly induce the condition independently, highlighting its secondary role in PUD pathology.

Choice D rationale

Stress is associated with peptic ulcer disease but is not a primary causative factor. Psychological stress can lead to hypersecretion of gastric acid, aggravating mucosal vulnerability in susceptible individuals. However, its role is predominantly indirect, amplifying existing risk factors like Helicobacter pylori infection. Stress-induced ulcers are typically seen in critical illnesses or severe physiological stress conditions, differing from PUD pathogenesis.

Choice A rationale

Using a Foley catheter can help prevent skin breakdown caused by prolonged contact with urine in incontinent patients, especially if they are confused or non-ambulatory and unable to use other urinary devices. Maintaining intact skin is crucial to avoiding infections and pressure injuries, making a Foley catheter a suitable intervention in specific cases when prescribed.

Choice B rationale

Foley catheters are not inherently inappropriate but must be prescribed judiciously due to risks like urinary tract infections. While alternative methods may be preferable, this intervention is justified for incontinent, immobile patients with compromised mental status to protect skin integrity. It aligns with clinical guidelines and patient-specific needs.