Which of the following approaches is best to determine the quality and strength of a research study?
Discarding systematic reviews.
Selecting only studies with meta-analyses since they are the weakest form of evidence.
Evaluating the quality of studies with a sample size of at least 250 people.
Accepting only studies that use a randomized controlled trial design.
Evaluating studies against the standards for that type of research.
The Correct Answer is E
Choice A Reason:
Discarding systematic reviews is not a recommended approach for determining the quality and strength of a research study. Systematic reviews are comprehensive summaries of all the available evidence on a particular topic and are considered one of the highest levels of evidence in research. They use rigorous methods to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the results of relevant studies, providing a reliable overview of the evidence. Discarding them would mean ignoring a valuable source of high-quality information.
Choice B Reason:
Selecting only studies with meta-analyses since they are the weakest form of evidence is incorrect. In fact, meta-analyses are considered one of the strongest forms of evidence. They combine data from multiple studies to provide a more precise estimate of the effect of an intervention or exposure. By pooling data, meta-analyses increase the statistical power and provide more robust conclusions than individual studies alone. Therefore, this choice is based on a misunderstanding of the strength of meta-analyses.
Choice C Reason:
Evaluating the quality of studies with a sample size of at least 250 people is not sufficient on its own to determine the quality and strength of a research study. While a larger sample size can increase the reliability of study results, it is not the only factor to consider. Other important aspects include the study design, methodology, data analysis, and potential biases. A comprehensive evaluation should consider all these factors rather than focusing solely on sample size.
Choice D Reason:
Accepting only studies that use a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design is too restrictive. While RCTs are considered the gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions due to their ability to minimize bias, they are not always feasible or ethical for all research questions. Other study designs, such as cohort studies, case-control studies, and qualitative research, can also provide valuable insights. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the quality of studies based on their design and methodology rather than excluding non-RCT studies outright.
Choice E Reason:
Evaluating studies against the standards for that type of research is the best approach to determine the quality and strength of a research study. This involves using established criteria and guidelines to assess the study’s design, methodology, data analysis, and reporting. By comparing the study to the standards for its specific type, researchers can identify strengths and weaknesses, determine the reliability of the findings, and make informed decisions about the evidence. This comprehensive approach ensures that all relevant factors are considered in the evaluation process.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A Reason
This scenario exemplifies compromising because both parties make concessions to reach a mutually beneficial agreement. Dameeka wants to work the evening shift permanently, and Jose, the head nurse, agrees to this request on the condition that Dameeka assists in mentoring the evening staff on the new clinical information system. This arrangement allows both parties to achieve their goals while making necessary adjustments to accommodate each other’s needs.
Choice B Reason
This scenario demonstrates collaboration rather than compromising. Tim, the head nurse, involves the staff in the decision-making process by asking for their ideas on how to meet the technology goals and address their needs. Collaboration involves working together to find a solution that satisfies all parties, whereas compromising involves making concessions.
Choice C Reason
This scenario does not exemplify compromising. Rita, the head nurse, avoids conflict by coming to work after Tom leaves the unit. This approach does not involve any negotiation or mutual agreement but rather avoidance of the issue altogether.
Choice D Reason
This scenario illustrates avoidance and disengagement rather than compromising. Alicia, the head nurse on the cardiac step-down unit, begins to miss management meetings because Franklin dominates the meetings and decisions. There is no attempt to negotiate or reach a mutual agreement in this situation.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Ensuring that patient education pamphlets explaining ICU procedures are easily accessible. While providing educational pamphlets is beneficial, it should not be the top priority. Pamphlets can supplement verbal communication but may not address the immediate emotional and informational needs of the parents. Effective communication in the ICU involves more personalized and interactive methods to ensure parents fully understand their child’s condition and care plan.
Choice B Reason:
Coordinating a specialist to have a conversation with the family. Involving a specialist can be very helpful, especially for complex medical conditions. However, this action should follow the initial assessment of the parents’ preferences and needs. Specialists can provide detailed information and answer specific questions, but understanding the parents’ desired level of information first ensures that the conversation is tailored to their needs.
Choice C Reason:
Assessing the parents’ preferences regarding the amount of information provided. This is the most critical step. Each family has different needs and preferences when it comes to receiving information about their child’s condition. Some may want detailed medical explanations, while others may prefer a more general overview. By assessing these preferences, the nurse can ensure that the information provided is appropriate and helpful, reducing anxiety and improving the family’s ability to make informed decisions.
Choice D Reason:
Guiding the family towards online information sources. While online resources can be valuable, they should not replace direct communication with healthcare providers. The quality and reliability of online information can vary, and parents may find it overwhelming or confusing. Direct, personalized communication is essential in critical care settings to ensure that parents receive accurate and relevant information.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.