A nurse is caring for a client that is immobile. The nurse recognizes that the appearance of non-blanchable erythema on the heels most likely indicates which of the following stages of pressure injuries?
Stage III pressure injury
Stage IV pressure injury
Stage II pressure injury
Stage I pressure injury
The Correct Answer is D
A. Stage III pressure injury
Stage III pressure injuries involve full-thickness skin loss, extending into the subcutaneous tissue but not through the fascia. These wounds typically present as deep craters and may involve undermining or tunneling. Non-blanchable erythema alone without visible skin loss is not characteristic of a Stage III pressure injury.
B. Stage IV pressure injury
Stage IV pressure injuries are the most severe and involve full-thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. These wounds often have extensive tissue damage and can be difficult to manage. Again, non-blanchable erythema without visible skin loss is not indicative of a Stage IV pressure injury.
C. Stage II pressure injury
Stage II pressure injuries involve partial-thickness skin loss with damage to the epidermis and possibly the dermis. These wounds often present as shallow open ulcers or blisters and may have characteristics such as intact or ruptured blisters. While Stage II injuries can present with erythema, non-blanchable erythema specifically indicates a Stage I injury.
D. Stage I pressure injury
Stage I pressure injuries are the earliest stage and involve non-blanchable erythema of intact skin. The skin may be warmer or cooler than surrounding tissue and may have changes in sensation. There is no visible skin loss at this stage, but the area is at risk for further injury if pressure is not relieved. Therefore, non-blanchable erythema on the heels most likely indicates a Stage I pressure injury.

Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
A. There is no redness, warmth, or drainage at the insertion site.
This assessment is crucial for evaluating the status of the abdominal drain site. The absence of redness, warmth, or drainage suggests that the insertion site is healing well without signs of infection or inflammation. It indicates that the drain is functioning properly and that there are no immediate complications related to the drain insertion. This assessment directly addresses the goals related to monitoring the drain site for signs of infection or dysfunction.
B. Drainage from the surgical site is 30 mL less than yesterday.
Monitoring the drainage output from the surgical site is important to assess for changes in drainage patterns. A decrease in drainage volume may indicate reduced fluid accumulation at the surgical site, potentially reflecting improved healing and decreased need for drainage. However, while this assessment is valuable, it is not as directly related to assessing the status of the drain itself or evaluating complications at the insertion site as option A.
C. The patient reports adequate pain control with medications.
Pain control is an essential aspect of postoperative care, but it is not specifically related to assessing the functionality or complications of the abdominal drain. While pain management is important for patient comfort and recovery, it does not directly address the goals related to monitoring the drain site for signs of infection, leakage, or other complications.
D. Urine is clear yellow, and urine output is greater than 40 mL/hr.
While monitoring urine output and characteristics is important for assessing renal function and hydration status, it is not directly related to assessing the abdominal drain or its complications. Clear yellow urine and adequate urine output are generally positive indicators but do not provide specific information about the functionality or status of the drain.
Correct Answer is ["A","C","D"]
Explanation
A. Blood pressure:
Monitoring blood pressure is a crucial aspect of evaluating fluid resuscitation in burn patients. Adequate fluid resuscitation should help maintain stable blood pressure levels within an acceptable range. Hypotension (low blood pressure) can indicate inadequate fluid resuscitation, leading to poor tissue perfusion and organ function. On the other hand, hypertension (high blood pressure) may suggest fluid overload, which can lead to complications such as pulmonary edema. Therefore, regular monitoring of blood pressure helps assess the effectiveness of fluid resuscitation and guides adjustments in fluid administration rates.
B. Bowel sounds:
While bowel sounds are important indicators of gastrointestinal motility and function, they are not directly used to evaluate the success of fluid resuscitation in burn patients. Bowel sounds may be assessed for other reasons, such as postoperative recovery or gastrointestinal conditions, but they do not provide specific information about fluid resuscitation status or tissue perfusion.
C. Level of consciousness:
Assessing the client's level of consciousness is crucial during fluid resuscitation for burns. Changes in consciousness, such as confusion, lethargy, or altered mental status, can indicate inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation. A clear and responsive level of consciousness suggests adequate fluid resuscitation and perfusion to vital organs, while alterations in consciousness may prompt further evaluation and adjustment of fluid resuscitation strategies.
D. Urine output:
Monitoring urine output is a key parameter in evaluating fluid resuscitation in burn patients. Adequate urine output (0.5 to 1 mL/kg/hr in adults) indicates sufficient renal perfusion and function, suggesting effective fluid resuscitation. Decreased urine output or oliguria may indicate inadequate fluid resuscitation, renal impairment, or hypovolemia, requiring reassessment and potential adjustments in fluid administration rates or type of fluids used.
E. Platelet count:
Platelet count is an important component of the complete blood count (CBC) and is used to assess clotting function and risk of bleeding. However, platelet count is not specifically used to evaluate the success of fluid resuscitation in burn patients. While clotting parameters may be monitored in burn patients, including platelet count, they are not direct indicators of fluid resuscitation status or tissue perfusion. Other laboratory parameters, such as hemoglobin, hematocrit, electrolyte levels, and arterial blood gases, may be monitored to assess the effectiveness of fluid resuscitation.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.