A nurse is collecting data from a client who has Parkinson's disease and is experiencing bradykinesia. Which of the following findings should the nurse expect?

A. Adventitious breath sounds:

Adventitious breath sounds refer to abnormal lung sounds heard upon auscultation of the chest. These sounds include crackles (rales), wheezes, rhonchi, and pleural friction rubs. In the context of fluid volume excess, particularly in the acute phase of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or stroke, adventitious breath sounds such as crackles are indicative of pulmonary edema. Pulmonary edema occurs when there is an excessive accumulation of fluid in the lungs, impairing gas exchange and leading to symptoms such as shortness of breath and respiratory distress.

B. Weak pulse:

A weak pulse may suggest poor perfusion or decreased cardiac output rather than fluid volume excess. While decreased cardiac output can be a consequence of heart failure, which may be associated with fluid volume excess, a weak pulse is not a direct indicator of fluid overload. In the acute phase of a CVA, a weak pulse may prompt further assessment for other cardiovascular complications or neurogenic shock.

C. Hypotension:

Hypotension, or low blood pressure, is not typically associated with fluid volume excess. Instead, hypotension may indicate hypovolemia, shock, or other underlying cardiovascular conditions. While hypotension can occur secondary to severe heart failure or fluid overload in some cases, it is not a direct indicator of fluid volume excess in the acute phase of a CVA.

D. Poor skin turgor:

Poor skin turgor is a clinical finding associated with dehydration rather than fluid volume excess. In dehydration, the skin loses its elasticity and becomes less resilient when pinched. In contrast, fluid volume excess is characterized by edema, which may manifest as pitting or non-pitting edema, rather than poor skin turgor. However, in fluid volume excess, the skin may appear stretched or taut due to the accumulation of fluid in the interstitial spaces.

A. "It is too early to tell. When the spinal shock subsides, we will know more."

This response is appropriate. Spinal shock can initially obscure the extent of neurological injury, and it may take time for the full extent of the injury to become apparent. By acknowledging this and suggesting that more information will be available once spinal shock subsides, the nurse provides a realistic perspective without prematurely predicting the outcome.

B. "You should talk to your physician about things of that nature."

This response may come across as dismissive or evasive. While it is true that the physician ultimately determines the patient's prognosis, the family may be seeking reassurance and guidance from the nurse as well.

C. "No. Significant recovery of function should occur in a few days."

This response is overly optimistic and potentially misleading. While some improvement may occur in the days following a spinal cord injury, significant recovery of function within a few days is unlikely, especially in cases of flaccid paralysis of all extremities.

D. "Yes. In all likelihood, the paralysis is probably permanent."

This response is overly pessimistic and lacks sensitivity. It may unnecessarily distress the family and extinguish hope for the patient's recovery.