A postoperative home care client has developed thrombophlebitis in her right leg.
What category of medications will probably be prescribed for this cardiovascular complication?

Rationale for Choice A:
Sims' position is a side-lying position with the lower arm and leg flexed and the upper arm and leg extended. It is not ideal for bladder scanning because it can displace the bladder and potentially lead to inaccurate readings. While it can be used for other purposes, such as inserting rectal suppositories or performing vaginal exams, it's not the optimal choice for bladder scanning.
Rationale for Choice B:
Dorsal recumbent position is a supine position with the knees bent and feet flat on the bed. While it provides some exposure of the bladder, it may not fully visualize the entire bladder due to potential compression from the abdominal contents. This can also result in inaccurate readings.
Rationale for Choice D:
High Fowler's position is a semi-sitting position with the head of the bed elevated at a 45- to 60-degree angle. This position is not suitable for bladder scanning because it can cause the bladder to shift upward and out of the optimal scanning range. It's typically used for respiratory comfort and procedures involving the head and upper body.
Rationale for Choice C:
Supine position is the best position for bladder scanning because it allows for the most accurate visualization of the bladder. In this position, the patient lies flat on their back with their legs extended. This position allows the bladder to rest naturally in the pelvic cavity, ensuring optimal positioning for the bladder scanner to capture a clear image and provide an accurate measurement of bladder volume. It also promotes patient comfort and relaxation during the procedure.

Rationale for Choice A:
Making assessments every 15 minutes for four hours does not directly address the immediate concern of blood loss and potential hemodynamic instability. While close monitoring is essential, it's not the primary action in this situation.
Excessive blood loss can rapidly lead to hypovolemic shock, which requires prompt intervention to prevent serious complications.
Relying solely on frequent assessments without active interventions could delay crucial treatment and compromise patient safety.
Rationale for Choice B:
Documenting the data, removing the old dressing, and applying a new dressing might be necessary at some point, but it's not the most urgent priority in this case.
Removing the dressing could disrupt clot formation and potentially worsen bleeding.
Applying a new dressing without addressing the underlying bleeding might not effectively control the blood loss. Rationale for Choice C:
Applying a well-secured additional pressure dressing is the most appropriate immediate action to help control bleeding and prevent further blood loss.
It provides direct compression to the surgical site, promoting hemostasis and reducing blood flow. This action prioritizes stabilizing the patient's condition and preventing further complications.

Reporting the findings to the healthcare provider is crucial for timely assessment, diagnosis, and management of potential complications, such as hemorrhage or hematoma.
It ensures collaboration with the healthcare team and facilitates appropriate interventions based on the patient's specific needs.
Rationale for Choice D:
Reassuring the family that this is a common problem might provide some comfort, but it doesn't address the patient's immediate needs or the potential severity of the situation.
It's essential to prioritize patient safety and provide interventions to control bleeding, even if bleeding is a known potential complication.
Transparency and clear communication with the family are important, but they should not replace necessary medical interventions.