The nurse is assessing a teenage client and notes his lower front teeth are slightly crossed over. The nurse points out to his caregiver that he should see an orthodontist about this to prevent which potential situation?
Leaving even slightly crooked teeth will lead to more cavities later in life.
Uncorrected malocclusions lead to infection and ultimately tooth loss.
This could have a lasting effect on his future to include everything from dating to hiring.
Even slight malocclusions make chewing and jaw function less efficient.
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: Slightly crooked teeth may complicate oral hygiene but are not a primary cause of cavities, which depend more on brushing and diet. Malocclusions affect chewing efficiency, making this less accurate and incorrect compared to the functional impact of misaligned teeth noted during the assessment.
Choice B reason: Malocclusions do not directly cause infections or tooth loss unless severe and untreated. Slight cross-over primarily impacts chewing and jaw function, not infection risk, making this exaggerated and incorrect for the primary reason to seek orthodontic consultation for the teenager’s teeth.
Choice C reason: Social impacts like dating or hiring are speculative and not the primary clinical concern for slight malocclusions. Chewing and jaw efficiency are direct functional issues, making this psychosocial focus less relevant and incorrect for the orthodontic referral rationale in this clinical scenario.
Choice D reason: Slight malocclusions, like crossed front teeth, can impair chewing and jaw function, leading to inefficient mastication or strain. This functional concern justifies orthodontic evaluation, aligning with dental health principles, making it the correct reason to recommend seeing an orthodontist for the teenager.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Picking up the child without assessment risks disrupting a potentially critical condition, as quiet lying may indicate pain or altered consciousness. Checking consciousness and pain ensures safety, making this premature and incorrect compared to prioritizing a thorough evaluation of the child’s quiet state.
Choice B reason: Leaving the child in a flexed position assumes no issue without assessing consciousness or pain, which quiet behavior may mask. Evaluating the child’s status is critical, making this passive and incorrect compared to actively checking for underlying issues in the child’s quiet presentation on the bed.
Choice C reason: Checking the level of consciousness and pain scale determines if the child’s quietness indicates distress, pain, or neurological issues, ensuring appropriate care. This aligns with pediatric assessment protocols, making it the correct action to address the child’s condition lying quietly on the bed.
Choice D reason: Assuming the child is sleeping on the parent’s lap is incorrect, as the child is on the bed, and quietness may indicate distress. Assessing consciousness and pain is essential, making this inaccurate and incorrect compared to evaluating the child’s true condition in this scenario.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Setting a good example by always wearing a seat belt models safe behavior, which children are likely to emulate. This prioritizes consistent safety habits, aligning with pediatric safety education principles, making it the most effective instruction for promoting car safety in families during a health fair presentation.
Choice B reason: Rewarding with candy for seat belt use may encourage compliance but risks unhealthy eating habits and extrinsic motivation. Modeling seat belt use fosters intrinsic safety habits, making this less effective and incorrect compared to the nurse’s priority of setting a consistent example for car safety.
Choice C reason: Stopping the car for unbuckled restraints addresses behavior but may be impractical and unsafe on busy roads. Modeling seat belt use prevents issues by reinforcing norms, making this reactive approach less prioritized and incorrect for the primary car safety instruction in a family setting.
Choice D reason: Explaining seat belt laws may inform but is less effective for young children who respond better to role modeling than legal consequences. Parental example drives behavior, making this less impactful and incorrect compared to prioritizing consistent seat belt use by adults in the family.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.