The nurse is aware that the patients who are allergic to intravenous contrast media are usually also allergic to which of the following products?

Choice A reason: Laxatives don’t significantly affect warfarin’s anticoagulation; this is safe. Aspirin increases bleeding risk, needing teaching, per nursing pharmacology. It’s a universal distinction, distinctly unrelated to warfarin’s primary concerns.

Choice B reason: Occasional antacids minimally impact warfarin; this is acceptable. Aspirin’s bleeding risk is the issue, per nursing standards. This doesn’t require teaching, universally distinct from anticoagulation education.

Choice C reason: Corn has negligible vitamin K; it doesn’t affect warfarin. Aspirin use needs correction, per nursing pharmacology. This is safe, universally distinct from dietary teaching for anticoagulants.

Choice D reason: Aspirin with warfarin heightens bleeding risk significantly; this requires teaching. Other statements are benign, per nursing standards. It’s a universal concern, distinctly critical for safe anticoagulation management.

Choice A reason: Antipyretics lower fever; Dilaudid relieves pain, not fever. This choice errors per nursing pharmacology. It’s universally distinct, unrelated to analgesic purpose.

Choice B reason: Dilaudid, an opioid analgesic, manages pain effectively. This aligns with nursing pharmacology standards precisely. It’s universally recognized, distinctly applied for pain relief.

Choice C reason: Antidepressants treat mood; Dilaudid targets pain instead. This choice misaligns with nursing standards. It’s universally distinct, off-target for Dilaudid’s role.

Choice D reason: Antibiotics combat infection; Dilaudid addresses pain only. This errors per nursing pharmacology principles. It’s universally distinct, missing analgesic classification.