A group of teenagers with diabetes become upset and angry because they cannot agree on whether or not to have meetings during summer vacation. Which of the following should the nurse do to be effective in helping the teenagers resolve the conflict?

Choice A reason: Sunscreen education prevents skin damage, a primary strategy. This fits public health standards precisely. It’s universally recognized, distinctly preemptive care.

Choice B reason: TB skin tests are secondary, detecting disease early. Sunscreen prevents, per nursing. This errors in level. It’s universally distinct.

Choice C reason: Pesticide screening is secondary; primary prevents exposure. Sunscreen fits, per public health. This misaligns with prevention type. It’s universally distinct.

Choice D reason: Medicine adherence is tertiary; sunscreen prevents issues. This errors per nursing standards. It’s universally distinct, treatment-focused.

Choice A reason: Social justice focuses on equitable resource distribution, like ensuring vaccine access for all. It’s related but narrower than this scenario’s broad goal of maximizing community health, which prioritizes overall outcomes over individual fairness, aligning less directly with the described policy intent fully.

Choice B reason: Beneficence emphasizes doing good, like providing care to one patient. It’s individual-focused, not the collective “greatest good” approach here, where policies sacrifice some happiness for community-wide health gains, distinguishing it from this broader ethical framework applied systematically across populations.

Choice C reason: Veracity is truth-telling, like honest risk communication. It’s unrelated to maximizing health for the majority, as this scenario prioritizes outcomes over transparency. Policies may obscure individual discontent, making truth secondary to achieving widespread health benefits ethically and practically here.

Choice D reason: Utilitarianism seeks the greatest good for the most people, as seen in these policies improving community health despite some unhappiness. It balances benefits, like reduced disease rates, against minor individual costs, aligning perfectly with the described public health strategy comprehensively and ethically.