When assessing a patient’s eating habits, the nurse should ask which of the following?

Choice A reason: Environment is setting; bacteria are the agent causing infection. This errors per epidemiology standards. It’s universally distinct, not causative.

Choice B reason: Agent and host combine; bacteria alone are agent. This misaligns with triangle definitions. It’s universally distinct, overly broad.

Choice C reason: Host is the infected person, not bacteria. Agent fits, per nursing. This errors in role. It’s universally distinct.

Choice D reason: Agent is the bacteria causing vaginal infection, per epidemiology. This aligns with nursing standards. It’s universally applied, distinctly accurate.

Choice A reason: Policy development involves creating guidelines, like sanitation laws, to improve health systemically. It’s proactive but not the direct action here. Assessing homeless needs under a bridge focuses on data collection, not crafting rules to address broader public health infrastructure issues immediately.

Choice B reason: Assurance ensures health services are available, like enforcing clinic access for the homeless. It follows assessment, not the act of evaluating needs under a bridge, which prioritizes gathering data over guaranteeing interventions or monitoring compliance with health standards directly.

Choice C reason: Primary prevention, like vaccinations, stops disease before it starts. Walking under a bridge to assess needs isn’t preventive action but data collection to understand health risks among the homeless, not directly reducing disease incidence at that moment.

Choice D reason: Assessment involves collecting data on health status, as seen here with nurses evaluating homeless needs under a bridge. It’s foundational, identifying risks like malnutrition or infection prevalence, enabling subsequent interventions without immediately altering conditions or enforcing services directly.