How is the "client" most accurately described in Johnson's Behavioral System Model?

A) The client's spouse: This choice suggests that the client's spouse has the authority to give permission for a DNR order. In most cases, it is the competent client themselves who has the authority to make decisions about their own medical treatment, including DNR orders. Spouses may have a say and their input is considered, but the ultimate decision typically lies with the competent client.

B) The client's only child: This choice suggests that the client's only child can give permission for a DNR order. Similar to the explanation for choice A, the decision-making authority for a DNR order generally rests with the competent client, not their child. However, a client may choose to discuss their medical decisions with their child and take their wishes into consideration.

C) The client: This choice correctly identifies that the competent client themselves is the one who typically has the legal and ethical authority to make decisions about their medical treatment, including DNR orders. This is based on principles of autonomy and respect for the individual's wishes.

D) Any close blood-related relative: This choice suggests that any close blood-related relative has the authority to give permission for a DNR order. Similar to choices A and B, the decision-making authority is typically with the competent client. While family members' input is valuable and should be considered, they do not have the ultimate decision-making power for the client's medical treatment.

Best interest and nonmaleficence: These principles are typically not overlooked in child abuse cases. Ensuring the best interest of the child and avoiding harm are fundamental principles in child protection.

Privacy and self-determination: These principles can sometimes conflict with the need to report child abuse. Privacy concerns might make individuals hesitant to report suspicions, especially if they fear repercussions. Self-determination, especially in cases involving older children or teenagers, can complicate reporting if the child denies the abuse or refuses intervention.

Paternalism and beneficence: These principles, which involve acting in the best interest of the child even without their consent, are usually not overlooked. In cases of suspected child abuse, acting in the child's best interest often takes precedence.

Veracity and obligation: Veracity (truthfulness) is important in reporting child abuse, but it's not typically overlooked. Obligation to protect the child's safety and well-being often overrides concerns about confidentiality in suspected cases of abuse.