Which formula should be used to calculate a prevalence rate?
Number of new cases + number of old cases in a period of time / the total population x base multiple of 10
Number of true positives / number of true positives + number of false negatives
Number of true negatives / number of true negatives + number of false positives
Number of new cases in a period of time / total population x base multiple of 10
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A reason: Prevalence measures all cases (new and existing) of a disease in a population at a given time. This formula captures total burden, like diabetes cases, divided by population, adjusted by a base (e.g., 1000), reflecting overall disease presence accurately.
Choice B reason: This formula calculates sensitivity, not prevalence. It’s used in diagnostics to assess true positive rates for diseases like cancer against missed cases, focusing on test accuracy, not the total number of affected individuals in a population over time.
Choice C reason: This represents specificity, evaluating true negatives in diagnostic testing, not prevalence. It’s relevant for ruling out disease, like tuberculosis, but doesn’t quantify how many people currently have it within a population, missing the broader epidemiological scope entirely.
Choice D reason: This defines incidence, not prevalence, counting only new cases over time, like annual flu cases. It excludes existing cases, underrepresenting the total disease load in a population, which prevalence aims to capture comprehensively for health planning.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Primary prevents disease; helmet use manages diabetes complications. This errors per public health standards. It’s universally distinct, pre-disease focus.
Choice B reason: Secondary screens; helmet education aids existing diabetes. This misaligns with nursing definitions. It’s universally distinct, not detection-based.
Choice C reason: Tertiary prevents complications in diagnosed diabetics, like injury. This fits public health standards. It’s universally applied, distinctly post-diagnosis care.
Choice D reason: Policy isn’t prevention; helmet use is tertiary. This errors per nursing standards. It’s universally distinct, not a prevention level.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Phrase books lack accuracy; interpreters ensure clear communication. This errors per nursing standards. It’s universally distinct, less effective.
Choice B reason: Interpreters provide accurate, culturally competent communication, per nursing standards. This aligns with best practice. It’s universally applied, distinctly optimal.
Choice C reason: Stating no Spanish doesn’t help; interpreters solve barriers. This misaligns with nursing care. It’s universally distinct, unhelpful action.
Choice D reason: Referral delays care; interpreters address immediate needs. This errors per public health standards. It’s universally distinct, indirect.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.