Share This Link

Performing a mouth sweep is not a recommended action for a client who has ingested a toxic agent. This procedure is typically used for unconscious individuals to clear the airway of solid objects and prevent aspiration. In the context of a toxic ingestion, a mouth sweep would be ineffective and potentially dangerous, as it could push the toxic substance further down the pharynx or cause injury. The primary focus for this type of emergency is to manage the ingested substance directly, not to clear the mouth of solid particles.

Inducing vomiting is no longer a recommended first-aid intervention for most poisonings. This practice can be harmful, as it risks aspiration of the toxic substance into the lungs, which could cause chemical pneumonitis or other severe respiratory damage. Furthermore, certain caustic or corrosive agents can cause more damage to the esophagus upon re-exposure during vomiting. Current guidelines from poison control centers and emergency medical services generally advise against inducing vomiting and instead recommend contacting a poison control center immediately for expert guidance.

Administering syrup of ipecac is not a current recommended treatment for toxic ingestion. This substance, once used to induce vomiting, has been largely discontinued due to its limited effectiveness and potential for significant adverse effects, including lethargy and aspiration pneumonia. The risks associated with its use far outweigh any potential benefits, and its use is now considered contraindicated by most medical authorities. Its role has been replaced by more modern and safer methods of gastric decontamination, such as activated charcoal. *.
 

Removing the stinger by scraping it off with a knife blade is the recommended method. Unlike pulling with tweezers, which can squeeze the venom sac and inject more venom, a scraping motion minimizes this risk. The stinger of a honeybee is barbed and remains in the skin, attached to the venom sac. Removing it quickly and correctly is crucial to prevent further venom from being released into the body. This technique ensures that the venom sac is not compressed, thus reducing the total amount of venom injected.

Sucking the wound is not recommended for a bee sting. This action is ineffective in removing venom and can introduce bacteria from the mouth into the wound, increasing the risk of infection. The venom quickly disperses into the surrounding tissues, making it impossible to remove by suction. Furthermore, this practice has no proven scientific benefit and can lead to secondary complications. The focus should be on proper stinger removal and symptom management, not on unproven methods.

Applying a tourniquet is not indicated for a bee sting. A tourniquet can cause severe tissue damage and even necrosis by cutting off blood circulation to the affected limb. Bee sting reactions are typically localized unless the client is severely allergic, in which case a tourniquet would be dangerous and ineffective. The systemic spread of venom is not something that can be stopped by constricting blood flow. This method is dangerous and should only be used in specific, life-threatening arterial bleeding situations.

Reassuring the family without disclosing the mistake violates the principle of being impeccable with your word. This approach involves a deliberate omission of crucial information, which undermines trust and integrity. By failing to disclose the error, the nurse leader is not being honest or transparent. This can lead to a breakdown in communication and erode the family's confidence in the healthcare team. Such an action prioritizes avoiding conflict over upholding ethical and professional obligations.

Avoiding discussing the error and focusing on future care is a form of deception by omission. This choice does not uphold the principle of being impeccable with your word because it withholds important information that the family has a right to know. While focusing on future care is important, it should not be a substitute for transparency regarding past events. A leader who practices this avoids accountability and creates a situation where the family cannot fully trust the information they are receiving.

Downplaying the error to calm the family is not being impeccable with your word. It involves a distortion of the truth to manage emotions, rather than a commitment to honesty. While the intention might be to reduce distress, this approach can ultimately cause greater harm if the family discovers the full extent of the error later. Being impeccable with your word means telling the complete and accurate truth, regardless of how difficult it may be, to maintain integrity and trust. .

Avoiding potentially upsetting conversations could compromise the ability to assess the situation and provide necessary assistance. The nurse must prioritize the client's safety, which may involve delicate but necessary interactions to gather information and build trust. While a non-confrontational approach is preferred, avoiding conversation entirely is not a viable strategy.

This statement is incorrect as nurses are frontline healthcare providers and are often the first point of contact for victims. Nurses have a professional and legal obligation to report suspected human trafficking. Dismissing suspicions would violate ethical principles and potentially perpetuate the victim's exploitation by failing to initiate the necessary protective measures.

Confronting the accompanying person could escalate the situation and place the adolescent and the nurse in a more dangerous position. A direct confrontation is not the recommended action and could alert the suspected trafficker, potentially leading to further harm to the victim or preventing the victim from receiving help. The proper procedure is to report suspicions discreetly to the authorities. *.

Workplace violence in emergency rooms is not a myth but a significant issue. Statistics from organizations like the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) indicate that healthcare workers, particularly in emergency departments, experience a disproportionately high rate of violence compared to other professions. This violence can be perpetrated by patients, visitors, or even co-workers.

Workplace violence encompasses more than just physical assaults. It also includes verbal abuse, threats, intimidation, and psychological harassment. While physical assaults are a serious component, focusing solely on them minimizes the full scope of violence healthcare workers experience daily. Both physical and non-physical forms of violence contribute to stress and burnout.

This is an incorrect statement. Emergency rooms have a high, not low, risk of workplace violence. The combination of emotionally charged situations, unpredictable patient populations, and high-stress scenarios makes these departments particularly vulnerable. Healthcare organizations are actively implementing prevention programs to mitigate these risks. *.

 

Role stress is not related to a nurse's ranking in the healthcare team. Role stress is a psychological construct that describes the pressure an individual feels when the responsibilities of their role become overwhelming or create conflicting demands. It is not about hierarchy but about the burden of the job itself.

While performance targets can contribute to stress, role stress is a broader concept. It encompasses the general pressure associated with a nurse's day-to-day responsibilities, not just specific metrics set by an organization. It is a multi-faceted phenomenon that relates to the entire scope of the nursing role.

The conflict between nurses and physicians is a specific type of workplace conflict and is not the sole or best description of role stress. Role stress is an internal psychological state related to the demands of the role itself, not necessarily an interpersonal conflict between different healthcare professionals. *.
 

Atropine is an anticholinergic medication that is used to increase heart rate in bradycardia, not to speed up respirations. It works by blocking the vagus nerve's action on the heart. Administering atropine to a hypothermic patient with slow breathing is inappropriate and could have adverse effects without addressing the underlying hypothermia. The standard of care focuses on rewarming the patient.

Heparin is an anticoagulant used to prevent blood clot formation. It has no role in the management of hypothermia or slow breathing. Administering heparin would be an incorrect intervention and could put the client at risk of bleeding, especially if they have other injuries. The primary goal is to rewarm the client.

Trying to maintain a normal room temperature is an insufficient measure for a hypothermic client. The client's core body temperature is already below normal (less than 95°F or 35°C), and they require active rewarming techniques to raise it. Simply maintaining the room temperature will not be effective and will delay proper treatment. .